Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Political Effects of the Internet and Social Media
2020279 citationsEkaterina Zhuravskaya, Maria Petrova et al.Annual Review of Economicsprofile →
Radio and the Rise of The Nazis in Prewar Germany*
2015278 citationsMaja Adena, Рубен Ениколопов et al.profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Рубен Ениколопов
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Рубен Ениколопов's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Рубен Ениколопов with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Рубен Ениколопов more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Рубен Ениколопов
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Рубен Ениколопов. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Рубен Ениколопов. The network helps show where Рубен Ениколопов may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Рубен Ениколопов
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Рубен Ениколопов.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Рубен Ениколопов based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Рубен Ениколопов. Рубен Ениколопов is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Zhuravskaya, Ekaterina, Maria Petrova, & Рубен Ениколопов. (2020). Political Effects of the Internet and Social Media. Annual Review of Economics. 12(1). 415–438.279 indexed citations breakdown →
Beath, Andrew, Fotini Christia, & Рубен Ениколопов. (2015). The National Solidarity Program: Assessing the Effects of Community-Driven Development in Afghanistan. SSRN Electronic Journal.1 indexed citations
Beath, Andrew, Fotini Christia, & Рубен Ениколопов. (2013). Randomized Impact Evaluation of Afghanistan's National Solidarity Programme. World Bank Other Operational Studies. 1–152.5 indexed citations
Beath, Andrew, Fotini Christia, & Рубен Ениколопов. (2013). Randomized impact evaluation of Afghanistan's national solidarity program : executive summary of the final report. 1–6.2 indexed citations
14.
Christia, Fotini, Andrew Beath, & Рубен Ениколопов. (2013). Empowering Women through Development Aid: Evidence from a Field Experiment in Afghanistan. DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology).119 indexed citations
Ениколопов, Рубен, et al.. (2012). Field Experiment Estimate of Electoral Fraud in Russian Parliamentary Elections. SSRN Electronic Journal.14 indexed citations
18.
DellaVigna, Stefano, Рубен Ениколопов, Vera Mironova, Maria Petrova, & Ekaterina Zhuravskaya. (2011). Unintended Media Effects in a Conflict Environment: Serbian Radio and Croatian Nationalism. National Bureau of Economic Research. 2011.8 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.