Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
The Rosetta Mission: Flying Towards the Origin of the Solar System
2007398 citationsKarl‐Heinz Glaßmeier, E. Kührt et al.Space Science Reviewsprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of E. Kührt's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by E. Kührt with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites E. Kührt more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by E. Kührt. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by E. Kührt. The network helps show where E. Kührt may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of E. Kührt
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of E. Kührt.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of E. Kührt based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with E. Kührt. E. Kührt is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Attree, Nicholas, O. Groussin, L. Jordá, et al.. (2017). Thermal fracturing on comets. Astronomy and Astrophysics. 610. A76–A76.22 indexed citations
6.
Behnke, Thomas, et al.. (2015). Imaging Systems for Planetary Exploration. ESASP. 732. 47.1 indexed citations
7.
Jordá, L., S. F. Hviid, Claire Capanna, et al.. (2014). The Shape of Comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko from Rosetta/Osiris Images. elib (German Aerospace Center). 2014.1 indexed citations
8.
Biele, Jens, et al.. (2014). Recommended values and correlations of thermophysical properties for comet modelling. 2014 AGU Fall Meeting. 2014(2). 141–4.1 indexed citations
9.
Grott, Matthias, J. Knollenberg, Alessandro Maturilli, et al.. (2013). Mineralogical Surface Characterization using the MASCOT Radiometer MARA on the Hayabusa 2 Mission. elib (German Aerospace Center). 1597.4 indexed citations
10.
Grott, Matthias, J. Knollenberg, E. Keßler, et al.. (2013). The MASCOT Radiometer MARA for the Hayabusa 2 Mission. elib (German Aerospace Center). 1586.1 indexed citations
Kührt, E., S. Mottola, Peter Spietz, et al.. (2009). AsteroidFinder - a German Mission for the Search of IEOs. elib (German Aerospace Center). 41.
15.
Mottola, S., Jan Thimo Grundmann, Gerhard Hahn, et al.. (2008). AsteroidFinder: A Space-Based Search for IEOs. LPICo. 1405. 8140.1 indexed citations
16.
Motschmann, U., et al.. (2005). Analytical solution for the expansion of the Deep Impact vapor plume. elib (German Aerospace Center). 37.1 indexed citations
17.
Hahn, Gerhard, et al.. (2002). Earthguard-1: A NEO Detection Space Mission. elib (German Aerospace Center). 500. 107–110.2 indexed citations
Ксанфомалити, Л. В., S. L. Murchie, D. T. Britt, et al.. (1991). Physical properties of Phobos' regolith.. 29. 621–640.2 indexed citations
20.
Grün, E., et al.. (1990). Energy balance of the KOSI 4 experiment.. Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society. 22(3). 1101.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.