E. Hecke
- Algebra and Number Theory top 10%
- Analytic Number Theory Research 3
- Advanced Mathematical Identities 1
- Geometry and Topology top 5%
- Mathematical Physics top 10%
-
- History and Theory of Mathematics 3
-
- Dutch Social and Cultural Studies 1
-
- Polynomial and algebraic computation 1
-
- Historical Linguistics and Language Studies 1
-
- Homelessness and Social Issues 1
-
- Meromorphic and Entire Functions 1
- Co-authors
- Bruno SchoenebergDavid E. RohrlichPeter RoquetteAnn VerhetselIvo ThomasGilles RixhonJean-Marie Halleux
- Journals
- American Mathematical Monthly (1 paper)Graduate texts in mathematics (1 paper)Medical Entomology and Zoology (1 paper)
In The Last Decade
E. Hecke
5 papers receiving 165 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 32
- Algebra and Number Theory 100
- Geometry and Topology 114
- Mathematical Physics 91
- Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics 31
- Theoretical Computer Science 8
Countries citing papers authored by E. Hecke
This map shows the geographic impact of E. Hecke's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by E. Hecke with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites E. Hecke more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by E. Hecke
This network shows the impact of papers produced by E. Hecke. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by E. Hecke. The network helps show where E. Hecke may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 7 scholars most cited alongside E. Hecke, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Le mouvement pendulaire en Belgique : les déplacements domicile-travail, les déplacements domicile-école. Enquête Socio-économique 2001. Monographies (n°10) | 2009 | 2 |
| 2 | 1987 | 3 | |
| 3 | 1987 | 1 | |
| 4 | 1984 | 7 | |
| 5 | Lectures on Dirichlet series, modular functions, and quadratic forms | 1983 | 44 |
| 6 | 1981 | 148 |
About E. Hecke
E. Hecke is a scholar working on Theoretical Computer Science, Algebra and Number Theory, Language and Linguistics, Applied Mathematics and Computational Theory and Mathematics, having authored 6 papers that have together received 205 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include History and Theory of Mathematics (3 papers), Analytic Number Theory Research (3 papers), Dutch Social and Cultural Studies (1 paper), Advanced Mathematical Identities (1 paper), Polynomial and algebraic computation (1 paper), Historical Linguistics and Language Studies (1 paper), Homelessness and Social Issues (1 paper) and Meromorphic and Entire Functions (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Algebra and Number Theory (100 citations), Geometry and Topology (114 citations), Mathematical Physics (91 citations), Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics (31 citations) and Theoretical Computer Science (8 citations). E. Hecke has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Belgium and France. Frequent co-authors include Bruno Schoeneberg, David E. Rohrlich, Peter Roquette, Ann Verhetsel, Ivo Thomas, Gilles Rixhon and Jean-Marie Halleux. Their work appears in journals such as American Mathematical Monthly, Graduate texts in mathematics and Medical Entomology and Zoology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.