Ivo Thomas

29 papers receiving 141 citations

Peers

Ivo Thomas
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
  • Theoretical Computer Science 5
  • Philosophy 47
  • History and Philosophy of Science 18
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 59
  • Artificial Intelligence 71
Replace G. B. KEENE with:
G. B. KEENE China
Wolfgang Lenzen Germany
Guido Küng Switzerland
H. Putnam United States
Charles A. Baylis United States
Desmond Paul Henry United Kingdom
Franz von Kutschera Germany
Richard L. Purtill United States
Diego Marconi Italy
Samuel C. Wheeler United States
Ivo Thomas relative to G. B. KEENE China G. B. KEENE's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
G. B. KEENE · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ivo Thomas

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ivo Thomas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ivo Thomas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ivo Thomas more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ivo Thomas

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ivo Thomas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ivo Thomas. The network helps show where Ivo Thomas may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ivo Thomas, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ivo Thomas Line = papers co-authored together Ivo Thomas links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 45 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 196941
2 197323
3 197418
4 196218
5 196917
6 196812
7 19697
8 19646
9 19754
10 19593
11 19763
12
Le mouvement pendulaire en Belgique : les déplacements domicile-travail, les déplacements domicile-école. Enquête Socio-économique 2001. Monographies (n°10)
20092
13 19742
14 19602
15 19632
16 19702
17 19641
18 19621
19 19601
20 19711

About Ivo Thomas

Ivo Thomas is a scholar working on Computational Theory and Mathematics, Artificial Intelligence, Philosophy, Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics and General Health Professions, having authored 45 papers that have together received 181 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Algebra and Logic (9 papers), Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (5 papers), Semantic Web and Ontologies (4 papers), Classical Philosophy and Thought (4 papers), Mathematics and Applications (2 papers), Advanced Mathematical Identities (2 papers), Advanced Combinatorial Mathematics (2 papers) and Medieval Literature and History (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Theoretical Computer Science (5 citations), Philosophy (47 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (18 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (59 citations) and Artificial Intelligence (71 citations). Ivo Thomas has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Belgium and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Jordán, Tadeusz Kotarbiński, Storrs McCall, Donald J. Orth, N. J. Strausfeld, Robin Freeman, James L. Stone, P. O. Bishop, Hansjochem Autrum and W. A. van de Grind. Their work appears in journals such as Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, Journal of Symbolic Logic, The Classical World, The Philosophical Quarterly and The Philosophical Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact