Dwayne Schindler

639 total citations
10 papers, 447 citations indexed

About

Dwayne Schindler is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Clinical Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience. According to data from OpenAlex, Dwayne Schindler has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 447 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 3 papers in Social Psychology, 3 papers in Clinical Psychology and 3 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience. Recurrent topics in Dwayne Schindler's work include Neural dynamics and brain function (2 papers), Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (2 papers) and Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment (2 papers). Dwayne Schindler is often cited by papers focused on Neural dynamics and brain function (2 papers), Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (2 papers) and Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment (2 papers). Dwayne Schindler collaborates with scholars based in Canada. Dwayne Schindler's co-authors include John Hunsley, Leslie S. Greenberg, Susan M. Johnson, Peter Shizgal, Pierre-Paul Rompré, Marlene Best, Chantal Parent, Michael McCarrey, Catherine Bielajew and Kent Conover and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Brain Research and Behavioural Brain Research.

In The Last Decade

Dwayne Schindler

10 papers receiving 409 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Dwayne Schindler Canada 8 290 244 65 65 51 10 447
Marie Stiévenart Belgium 15 454 1.6× 210 0.9× 88 1.4× 43 0.7× 66 1.3× 41 692
Rachel Β. Blass Israel 16 591 2.0× 209 0.9× 65 1.0× 53 0.8× 19 0.4× 62 767
Amber M. Jarnecke United States 11 233 0.8× 164 0.7× 77 1.2× 29 0.4× 47 0.9× 49 471
Shiri Ben‐Naim Israel 10 177 0.6× 139 0.6× 47 0.7× 41 0.6× 14 0.3× 17 392
Katherine Sanborn United States 5 178 0.6× 82 0.3× 26 0.4× 31 0.5× 22 0.4× 8 358
Nestor L. Lopez United States 8 416 1.4× 144 0.6× 43 0.7× 41 0.6× 10 0.2× 12 638
Johanna Salo Finland 7 172 0.6× 70 0.3× 20 0.3× 43 0.7× 14 0.3× 8 286
Rachel Cohen United States 8 94 0.3× 67 0.3× 79 1.2× 145 2.2× 78 1.5× 17 492
Emily Robertson United States 16 284 1.0× 121 0.5× 145 2.2× 84 1.3× 5 0.1× 46 506
Alison Sommers United States 7 99 0.3× 115 0.5× 38 0.6× 34 0.5× 27 0.5× 10 397

Countries citing papers authored by Dwayne Schindler

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Dwayne Schindler's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dwayne Schindler with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dwayne Schindler more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Dwayne Schindler

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dwayne Schindler. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dwayne Schindler. The network helps show where Dwayne Schindler may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Dwayne Schindler

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Dwayne Schindler. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Dwayne Schindler based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Dwayne Schindler. Dwayne Schindler is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
1.
Davidson, Patrick S. R., et al.. (2013). Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the WAIS-IV and WMS-IV in Older Adults. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment. 31(4). 375–390. 8 indexed citations
2.
Stewart, Angela, et al.. (2011). Investigation of a neuropsychological screen for chemo-fog. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 5(4). 205–205. 1 indexed citations
3.
Stewart, Angela, et al.. (2011). Investigation of a neuropsychological screen for chemo-fog. Oncology Reviews. 5(4). 205–213. 2 indexed citations
4.
5.
McCarrey, Michael, et al.. (2001). The Relation Between Well-Being, Impostor Feelings, and Gender Role Orientation Among Canadian University Students. The Journal of Social Psychology. 141(2). 218–232. 50 indexed citations
6.
Bielajew, Catherine, Tamara Bushnik, Anne T. M. Konkle, & Dwayne Schindler. (2000). The substrate for brain-stimulation reward in the lateral preoptic area. Brain Research. 881(2). 112–120. 12 indexed citations
7.
Johnson, Susan M., John Hunsley, Leslie S. Greenberg, & Dwayne Schindler. (1999). Emotionally focused couples therapy: Status and challenges.. Clinical Psychology Science and Practice. 6(1). 67–79. 247 indexed citations
8.
Bielajew, Catherine, et al.. (1994). Factors that contribute to the reduced weight gain following chronic ventromedial hypothalamic stimulation. Behavioural Brain Research. 62(2). 143–148. 14 indexed citations
9.
Shizgal, Peter, Kent Conover, & Dwayne Schindler. (1991). Medial forebrain bundle units in the rat: dependence of refractory period estimates on pulse duration. Behavioural Brain Research. 42(2). 151–160. 14 indexed citations
10.
Shizgal, Peter, Dwayne Schindler, & Pierre-Paul Rompré. (1989). Forebrain neurons driven by rewarding stimulation of the medial forebrain bundle in the rat: comparison of psychophysical and electrophysiological estimates of refractory periods. Brain Research. 499(2). 234–248. 40 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026