Drew Nesdale
- Social Psychology top 0.5%
- Sociology and Political Science top 0.5%
- Clinical Psychology top 2%
- Education top 1%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- Co-authors
- Judith GriffithsKevin DurkinAnne MaassMelanie J. Zimmer‐GembeckAnita S. MakAmanda L. DuffyPatricia ToddJohn Watson
- Topics
- Social and Intergroup Psychology (40 papers)Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression (26 papers)Cultural Differences and Values (22 papers)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaItalyUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Drew Nesdale
69 papers receiving 3.0k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 101
- Social Psychology 1.9k
- Sociology and Political Science 1.9k
- Clinical Psychology 922
- Education 649
- Cognitive Neuroscience 333
Countries citing papers authored by Drew Nesdale
This map shows the geographic impact of Drew Nesdale's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Drew Nesdale with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Drew Nesdale more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Drew Nesdale
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Drew Nesdale. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Drew Nesdale. The network helps show where Drew Nesdale may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Drew Nesdale
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Drew Nesdale. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Drew Nesdale based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Drew Nesdale. Drew Nesdale is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 28 | |
| 2 | 98 | |
| 3 | 59 | |
| 4 | 69 | |
| 5 | 98 | |
| 6 | 18 | |
| 7 | 37 | |
| 8 | Social groups and children"s intergroup prejudice: Just how influential are social group norms? | 14 |
| 9 | 19 | |
| 10 | 11 | |
| 11 | 78 | |
| 12 | 43 | |
| 13 | 36 | |
| 14 | 12 | |
| 15 | 168 | |
| 16 | 209 | |
| 17 | 37 | |
| 18 | Just what does it take to get international and Australian students to talk to teach other | 1 |
| 19 | International students and immigration | 21 |
| 20 | Just What Does it take to get International and Australian students to talk to each other | 1 |
About Drew Nesdale
Drew Nesdale is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science and Communication, having authored 70 papers that have together received 3.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Social and Intergroup Psychology (40 papers), Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression (26 papers) and Cultural Differences and Values (22 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Social Psychology (1.9k citations), Clinical Psychology (922 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (1.9k citations). Drew Nesdale has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Italy and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Judith Griffiths, Kevin Durkin, Anne Maass, Melanie J. Zimmer‐Gembeck, Anita S. Mak, Amanda L. Duffy, Patricia Todd, John Watson, Rosanna Rooney and Geraldine Downey. Their work appears in journals such as Child Development, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin and Journal of Personality.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.