Douglas Moore

30 papers receiving 556 citations

Peers

Douglas Moore
Comparison fields: 5 of 119
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 126
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 50
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 88
  • Management Science and Operations Research 54
  • Numerical Analysis 23
Replace Jean‐Luc Gouzé with:
Jean‐Luc Gouzé France
Xianming Liu China
Thomas Sturm Germany
Zhijun Wu United States
Leonid Kalachev United States
Samuel M. Selby
Søren Hauberg Denmark
Jesús Clemente-Gallardo Spain
Joke Blom Netherlands
Anirban Bhattacharya United States
Douglas Moore relative to Jean‐Luc Gouzé France Jean‐Luc Gouzé's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.2×
Jean‐Luc Gouzé · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Douglas Moore

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Douglas Moore's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Douglas Moore with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Douglas Moore more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Douglas Moore

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Douglas Moore. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Douglas Moore. The network helps show where Douglas Moore may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Douglas Moore, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Douglas Moore Line = papers co-authored together Douglas Moore links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 31 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2000150
2 2021103
3 201867
4 201747
5 199631
6 197529
7 201824
8 199822
9 202221
10 197621
11 201811
12 20119
13 20157
14 20177
15 20175
16 19825
17 20254
18 20124
19 20234
20 20183

About Douglas Moore

Douglas Moore is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Molecular Biology, Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Cognitive Neuroscience and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, having authored 31 papers that have together received 588 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Black Holes and Theoretical Physics (5 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (4 papers), Gene Regulatory Network Analysis (4 papers), Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques (3 papers), Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions (3 papers), Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (3 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (2 papers) and Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computational Theory and Mathematics (126 citations), Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (50 citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (88 citations), Management Science and Operations Research (54 citations) and Numerical Analysis (23 citations). Douglas Moore has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Sara Imari Walker, Paul D. Frank, Andrew Booker, Charles Audet, Michael Levin, Leroy Cronin, John Urquhart, Gabriele Valentini, Graham Keenan and Emma Carrick. Their work appears in journals such as Medical Physics, Nature Communications, Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, International Journal of Modern Physics D and Journal of Astronomical Telescopes Instruments and Systems.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact