Leonid Kalachev

1.2k citations
60 papers · 818 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Leonid Kalachev

54 papers receiving 744 citations

Peers

Leonid Kalachev
Comparison fields: 5 of 122
  • Numerical Analysis 207
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 152
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 133
  • Applied Mathematics 85
  • Modeling and Simulation 32
Replace John W. Lee with:
John W. Lee United States
Dean Korošak Slovenia
Р. Р. Алиев Russia
Joseph B. Keller United States
Karl Michael Schmidt United Kingdom
Jaime Cisternas Chile
Takashi Teramoto Japan
W. D. Deering United States
Daniele Andreucci Italy
Leonid Kalachev relative to John W. Lee United States John W. Lee's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.2×
John W. Lee · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Leonid Kalachev

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Leonid Kalachev's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Leonid Kalachev with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Leonid Kalachev more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Leonid Kalachev

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Leonid Kalachev. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Leonid Kalachev. The network helps show where Leonid Kalachev may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Leonid Kalachev, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Leonid Kalachev Line = papers co-authored together Leonid Kalachev links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 60 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1995257
2 200896
3 201368
4 200249
5 202134
6 201427
7 199526
8 200923
9 200115
10 202214
11 201514
12 202113
13 199712
14 201112
15 200110
16 199910
17 201910
18 19949
19 20018
20 19968

About Leonid Kalachev

Leonid Kalachev is a scholar working on Numerical Analysis, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Molecular Biology, Computer Networks and Communications and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, having authored 60 papers that have together received 818 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Differential Equations and Numerical Methods (13 papers), Advanced Mathematical Modeling in Engineering (8 papers), Nonlinear Dynamics and Pattern Formation (7 papers), Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue (6 papers), Numerical methods for differential equations (5 papers), Mathematical and Theoretical Epidemiology and Ecology Models (4 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (4 papers) and Material Science and Thermodynamics (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Numerical Analysis (207 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (152 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (133 citations), Applied Mathematics (85 citations) and Modeling and Simulation (32 citations). Leonid Kalachev has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Finland and Australia. Frequent co-authors include A. B. Vasil’eva, В. Ф. Бутузов, Hans P. A. Van Dongen, Peter McCauley, David F. Dinges, Heikki Haario, Richard J. Field, D.C. Rijken, Gregory Belenky and Siobhan Banks. Their work appears in journals such as Chemical Engineering Science, Forest Ecology and Management, Journal of Theoretical Biology, SIAM Journal on Mathematical Analysis and Infectious Disease Modelling.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact