Thomas Sturm

2.4k citations
62 papers · 1.2k · h-index 19

Impact in

Papers in

Thomas Sturm

56 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Thomas Sturm
Comparison fields: 5 of 112
  • Inorganic Chemistry 379
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 296
  • Organic Chemistry 477
  • Process Chemistry and Technology 30
  • Software 28
Replace Michael Albert with:
Michael Albert New Zealand
Jie Lan China
Masahiro Nomura Japan
Michał Startek Poland
Eduardo García Sánchez Switzerland
Dongming Chen China
Domingos M. Cardoso Portugal
Julien Tierny France
Łászló A. Székely United States
Thomas Sturm relative to Michael Albert New Zealand Michael Albert's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×14×
Michael Albert · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Sturm

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Sturm's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Sturm with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Sturm more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Sturm

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Sturm. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Sturm. The network helps show where Thomas Sturm may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Sturm, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Sturm Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Sturm links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 62 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2003181
2 1997163
3 201476
4 196553
5 200251
6 199849
7 199845
8 199740
9 196539
10 199834
11 200032
12 200831
13 201529
14 200429
15 200028
16 200127
17 200224
18 200919
19 199918
20 200618

About Thomas Sturm

Thomas Sturm is a scholar working on Computational Theory and Mathematics, Artificial Intelligence, Organic Chemistry, Inorganic Chemistry and Molecular Biology, having authored 62 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Polynomial and algebraic computation (15 papers), Logic, programming, and type systems (14 papers), Asymmetric Hydrogenation and Catalysis (12 papers), Formal Methods in Verification (12 papers), Asymmetric Synthesis and Catalysis (8 papers), Gene Regulatory Network Analysis (6 papers), Numerical Methods and Algorithms (5 papers) and Organometallic Complex Synthesis and Catalysis (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Inorganic Chemistry (379 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (296 citations), Organic Chemistry (477 citations), Process Chemistry and Technology (30 citations) and Software (28 citations). Thomas Sturm has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Spain and Austria. Frequent co-authors include Andreas Dolzmann, Walter Weissensteiner, Felix Spindler, Travis Thompson, Blanca R. Manzano, Félix A. Jalón, Luís F. Ramos, Paulo B. Lourénço, K. Mereiter and Ana M. Rodrı́guez. Their work appears in journals such as Organometallics, Journal of Computational Physics, Advanced Synthesis & Catalysis, Journal of Automated Reasoning and Bulletin of Mathematical Biology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact