Douglas McKie
- History and Philosophy of Science top 5%
- Management Science and Operations Research top 10%
- Education
- Social Psychology
- Developmental and Educational Psychology
- Co-authors
- Lee J. CronbachPeter H. SchönemannCharles Coulston GillispieEric RobinsonJ. R. PartingtonG. R. de BeerJ. C. WattDeirdre Coleman
- Topics
- History and advancements in chemistry (6 papers)Philosophy and History of Science (4 papers)Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis (3 papers)
- Cited by
- History and Philosophy of ScienceManagement Science and Operations ResearchGeneral Psychology
- Journals
- The American Historical ReviewEducational and Psychological MeasurementTechnology and Culture
- Partner nations
- United KingdomAustraliaMexico
In The Last Decade
Douglas McKie
20 papers receiving 216 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 98
- History and Philosophy of Science 45
- Management Science and Operations Research 41
- Education 29
- Social Psychology 25
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 21
Countries citing papers authored by Douglas McKie
This map shows the geographic impact of Douglas McKie's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Douglas McKie with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Douglas McKie more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Douglas McKie
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Douglas McKie. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Douglas McKie. The network helps show where Douglas McKie may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Douglas McKie
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Douglas McKie. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Douglas McKie based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Douglas McKie. Douglas McKie is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Historical studies on the phlogiston theory | 12 |
| 2 | The discovery of specific and latent heats | 12 |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 3 | |
| 5 | 14 | |
| 6 | 129 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 4 | |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | 18 | |
| 11 | 1 | |
| 12 | 1 | |
| 13 | 1 | |
| 14 | 4 | |
| 15 | 0 | |
| 16 | 0 | |
| 17 | 5 | |
| 18 | 21 | |
| 19 | 4 | |
| 20 | 8 |
About Douglas McKie
Douglas McKie is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Physical and Theoretical Chemistry and Museology, having authored 25 papers that have together received 269 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include History and advancements in chemistry (6 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (4 papers) and Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (45 citations), Management Science and Operations Research (41 citations) and General Psychology (3 citations). Douglas McKie has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and Mexico. Frequent co-authors include Lee J. Cronbach, Peter H. Schönemann, Charles Coulston Gillispie, Eric Robinson, J. R. Partington, G. R. de Beer, J. C. Watt, Deirdre Coleman and David Kennedy. Their work appears in journals such as The American Historical Review, Educational and Psychological Measurement and Technology and Culture.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.