Robert Northcott
-
- Philosophy and History of Science 19
- General Decision Sciences top 10%
- Philosophy top 5%
- Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics 4
-
- Philosophy and Theoretical Science 3
-
- Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference 4
-
- Economic Theory and Institutions 4
-
- Qualitative Comparative Analysis Research 2
- Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice 2
-
- Free Will and Agency 2
- Co-authors
- Anna AlexandrovaMichael J. ZyphurEd DienerStephen G. WestGualtiero PiccininiJosé Luis BermúdezGeoffrey BrennanCristina Bicchieri
- Journals
- Philosophy of Science (4 papers)Synthese (3 papers)Journal of Economic Methodology (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesAustralia
In The Last Decade
Robert Northcott
28 papers receiving 299 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 78
- History and Philosophy of Science 126
- General Decision Sciences 19
- Philosophy 64
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 47
- Applied Psychology 17
Countries citing papers authored by Robert Northcott
This map shows the geographic impact of Robert Northcott's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert Northcott with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert Northcott more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Robert Northcott
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert Northcott. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert Northcott. The network helps show where Robert Northcott may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 18 scholars most cited alongside Robert Northcott, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2022 | 65 | |
| 2 | 2022 | 5 | |
| 3 | 2022 | 7 | |
| 4 | 2021 | 9 | |
| 5 | 2019 | 13 | |
| 6 | Conceived This Way: Innateness Defended | 2018 | 6 |
| 7 | 2018 | 4 | |
| 8 | 2015 | 20 | |
| 9 | 2015 | 6 | |
| 10 | 2015 | 8 | |
| 11 | 2013 | 27 | |
| 12 | 2012 | 12 | |
| 13 | 2011 | 10 | |
| 14 | 2009 | 5 | |
| 15 | 2009 | 5 | |
| 16 | 2009 | 0 | |
| 17 | 2008 | 9 | |
| 18 | 2008 | 10 | |
| 19 | 2007 | 42 | |
| 20 | 2005 | 1 |
About Robert Northcott
Robert Northcott is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, General Decision Sciences, Philosophy, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Modeling and Simulation, having authored 29 papers that have together received 320 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy and History of Science (19 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (4 papers), Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference (4 papers), Economic Theory and Institutions (4 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (3 papers), Qualitative Comparative Analysis Research (2 papers), Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice (2 papers) and Free Will and Agency (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (126 citations), General Decision Sciences (19 citations), Philosophy (64 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (47 citations) and Applied Psychology (17 citations). Robert Northcott has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Anna Alexandrova, Michael J. Zyphur, Ed Diener, Stephen G. West, Gualtiero Piccinini, José Luis Bermúdez, Geoffrey Brennan, Cristina Bicchieri, David Gauthier and Jeffrey A. Barrett. Their work appears in journals such as Philosophy of Science, Synthese, Journal of Economic Methodology, Analysis and Philosophical Studies.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.