Douglas Farnill
- Social Psychology top 5%
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health top 5%
- Developmental and Educational Psychology top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Co-authors
- Ian BallSally C InglisRosalyn A. GriffithsJohn D. CoiePhilip R. CostanzoSusan HayesRoger PamphlettDelwyn J. Bartlett
- Topics
- Innovations in Medical Education (5 papers)Medical Education and Admissions (5 papers)Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited StatesSpain
In The Last Decade
Douglas Farnill
30 papers receiving 882 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 111
- Social Psychology 312
- Clinical Psychology 292
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 280
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 185
- Sociology and Political Science 171
Countries citing papers authored by Douglas Farnill
This map shows the geographic impact of Douglas Farnill's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Douglas Farnill with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Douglas Farnill more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Douglas Farnill
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Douglas Farnill. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Douglas Farnill. The network helps show where Douglas Farnill may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Douglas Farnill
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Douglas Farnill. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Douglas Farnill based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Douglas Farnill. Douglas Farnill is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 10 | |
| 2 | 127 | |
| 3 | 30 | |
| 4 | 24 | |
| 5 | 14 | |
| 6 | The role of effective feedback in clinical supervision. | 10 |
| 7 | 8 | |
| 8 | 4 | |
| 9 | 7 | |
| 10 | 30 | |
| 11 | 1 | |
| 12 | 3 | |
| 13 | 61 | |
| 14 | 37 | |
| 15 | 5 | |
| 16 | 14 | |
| 17 | 1 | |
| 18 | 9 | |
| 19 | 48 | |
| 20 | 81 |
About Douglas Farnill
Douglas Farnill is a scholar working on Pharmacy, Clinical Psychology and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 31 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovations in Medical Education (5 papers), Medical Education and Admissions (5 papers) and Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacy (116 citations), Family Practice (34 citations) and Social Psychology (312 citations). Douglas Farnill has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Ian Ball, Sally C Inglis, Rosalyn A. Griffiths, John D. Coie, Philip R. Costanzo, Susan Hayes, Roger Pamphlett, Delwyn J. Bartlett, Jill Gordon and Steven C. Hayes. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Child Development and Developmental Psychology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.