Dorothy E. Kemp

566 citations
11 papers · 517 indexed · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Dorothy E. Kemp

11 papers receiving 504 citations

Peers

Dorothy E. Kemp
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 431
  • Developmental Neuroscience 29
  • Molecular Biology 364
  • Physiology 15
  • Cell Biology 50
Replace Anne Barrie with:
Anne Barrie United Kingdom
Marie‐Françoise Diebler France
J Bockaert France
Tommy Nguyen Canada
Shubhro Pal United States
Mary H. Richards France
Chris Prior United Kingdom
J.G. Schofield United Kingdom
Paul M. Lea United States
Terri L. Whitworth United States
Dorothy E. Kemp relative to Anne Barrie United Kingdom Anne Barrie's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Anne Barrie · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Dorothy E. Kemp

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Dorothy E. Kemp's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dorothy E. Kemp with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dorothy E. Kemp more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Dorothy E. Kemp

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dorothy E. Kemp. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dorothy E. Kemp. The network helps show where Dorothy E. Kemp may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 15 scholars most cited alongside Dorothy E. Kemp, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Dorothy E. Kemp Line = papers co-authored together Dorothy E. Kemp links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
#Work
1 199014
2 199018
3 19898
4 198847
5 198764
6 198718
7 19866
8 198678
9
Primary culture of striatal neurons: a model of choice for pharmacological and biochemical studies of neurotransmitter receptors.
198636
10 1986172
11 198656

About Dorothy E. Kemp

Dorothy E. Kemp is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Physiology, Molecular Biology, Social Psychology and Nutrition and Dietetics, having authored 11 papers that have together received 517 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (7 papers), Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (5 papers), Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology (4 papers), Ion channel regulation and function (4 papers), Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (2 papers), Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior (2 papers), Adenosine and Purinergic Signaling (1 paper) and Cardiovascular, Neuropeptides, and Oxidative Stress Research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (431 citations), Developmental Neuroscience (29 citations), Molecular Biology (364 citations), Physiology (15 citations) and Cell Biology (50 citations). Dorothy E. Kemp has collaborated with scholars based in France, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Michèle Sebben, Samuel Weiss, Fritz Sladeczek, Joël Bockaert, Jean‐Philippe Pin, J Bockaert, Sam Weiss, Jacqueline Gabrion, Bernard Schmidt and John E. Ellis. Their work appears in journals such as Brain Research, Molecular Pharmacology, Journal of Neurochemistry, European Journal of Pharmacology and Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026