Donna Schwartz‐Barcott
- General Health Professions top 5%
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health top 5%
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science top 5%
- Education top 5%
- Co-authors
- Inger Margrethe HolterCatharina GillsjöGeoffrey GreeneHesook Suzie KimDonald N. LevineIréne von PostDayle Hunt JosephAlicia Curtin
- Topics
- Nursing education and management (5 papers)Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (4 papers)Cultural Competency in Health Care (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesSwedenNorway
In The Last Decade
Donna Schwartz‐Barcott
38 papers receiving 1.2k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 137
- General Health Professions 408
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 284
- Clinical Psychology 268
- Sociology and Political Science 268
- Education 152
Countries citing papers authored by Donna Schwartz‐Barcott
This map shows the geographic impact of Donna Schwartz‐Barcott's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Donna Schwartz‐Barcott with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Donna Schwartz‐Barcott more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Donna Schwartz‐Barcott
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Donna Schwartz‐Barcott. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Donna Schwartz‐Barcott. The network helps show where Donna Schwartz‐Barcott may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Donna Schwartz‐Barcott
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Donna Schwartz‐Barcott. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Donna Schwartz‐Barcott based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Donna Schwartz‐Barcott. Donna Schwartz‐Barcott is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 19 | |
| 2 | 7 | |
| 3 | 9 | |
| 4 | 5 | |
| 5 | 175 | |
| 6 | 98 | |
| 7 | 20 | |
| 8 | 3 | |
| 9 | 27 | |
| 10 | 60 | |
| 11 | 38 | |
| 12 | 4 | |
| 13 | 44 | |
| 14 | 8 | |
| 15 | 35 | |
| 16 | 5 | |
| 17 | 51 | |
| 18 | 34 | |
| 19 | 271 | |
| 20 | 7 |
About Donna Schwartz‐Barcott
Donna Schwartz‐Barcott is a scholar working on Research and Theory, Issues, ethics and legal aspects and Leadership and Management, having authored 40 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nursing education and management (5 papers), Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (4 papers) and Cultural Competency in Health Care (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (62 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (35 citations) and Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (115 citations). Donna Schwartz‐Barcott has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Sweden and Norway. Frequent co-authors include Inger Margrethe Holter, Catharina Gillsjö, Geoffrey Greene, Hesook Suzie Kim, Donald N. Levine, Iréne von Post, Dayle Hunt Joseph, Alicia Curtin, Diane C. Martins and Marilyn E. Asselin. Their work appears in journals such as Social Forces, Journal of Advanced Nursing and Appetite.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.