Donia R. Scott

17 papers receiving 497 citations

Peers

Donia R. Scott
Comparison fields: 5 of 86
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 234
  • Artificial Intelligence 228
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 93
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 91
  • Language and Linguistics 83
Replace Michael Israel with:
Michael Israel United States
Sarah Hamilton United States
Víctor Manuel Longa Martínez Spain
Philip Carr France
Thomas François Belgium
Daniel O. Jackson Japan
Scott R. Moisik Netherlands
John Bowden Australia
Jeffrey Steele Canada
Takeshi Nozawa Japan
Donia R. Scott relative to Michael Israel United States Michael Israel's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Michael Israel · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Donia R. Scott

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Donia R. Scott's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Donia R. Scott with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Donia R. Scott more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Donia R. Scott

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Donia R. Scott. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Donia R. Scott. The network helps show where Donia R. Scott may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Donia R. Scott

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Donia R. Scott. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Donia R. Scott based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Donia R. Scott. Donia R. Scott is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 13
2 115
3
Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence: Methodology, Systems, and Applications
0
4 22
5
The Multilingual Generation Game: Authoring Fluent Texts in Unfamiliar Languages
4
6 7
7 6
8
Intentions, Structure and Expression in Multi-Lingual Instructions
1
9 3
10
Volcanism by melt-driven Rayleigh-Taylor instabilities and possible consequences of melting for admittance ratios on Venus
7
11
Getting the message across in RST-based text generation
102
12 17
13 4
14 34
15 63
16
Glutathione peroxidase of calf trabecular meshwork.
16
17 1
18 153

About Donia R. Scott

Donia R. Scott is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Linguistics and Language and Language and Linguistics, having authored 18 papers that have together received 568 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Natural Language Processing Techniques (4 papers), Phonetics and Phonology Research (4 papers) and Language, Metaphor, and Cognition (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Linguistics and Language (82 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (234 citations) and Language and Linguistics (83 citations). Donia R. Scott has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Clarisse Sieckenius de Souza, Anne Cutler, Hugh O’Neill, J. M. G. Shelley, Andrew J. Berry, G. J. Foran, Stephen Isard, Bénédicte de Boysson-Bardies, Nadjet Bouayad‐Agha and Richard Power. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, American Mineralogist and Journal of Phonetics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026