Philip Carr

928 citations
21 papers · 362 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Philip Carr

18 papers receiving 307 citations

Peers

Philip Carr
Comparison fields: 5 of 52
  • Linguistics and Language 155
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 234
  • Language and Linguistics 165
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 86
  • Cultural Studies 24
Replace Nina Topintzi with:
Nina Topintzi Greece
Kazue Kanno United States
Tomas Riad Sweden
Madalena Cruz‐Ferreira Singapore
Kimary N. Shahin Canada
Natasha Abner United States
N. S. Trubetzkoy
Joanne Scheibman United States
John Bowden Australia
Meredith Tamminga United States
Philip Carr relative to Nina Topintzi Greece Nina Topintzi's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.5×
Nina Topintzi · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Philip Carr

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Philip Carr's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip Carr with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip Carr more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Philip Carr

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip Carr. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip Carr. The network helps show where Philip Carr may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 13 scholars most cited alongside Philip Carr, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Philip Carr Line = papers co-authored together Philip Carr links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Phonological knowledge : conceptual and empirical issues
200094
2
English phonetics and phonology
199987
3
English phonetics and phonology : an introduction
201336
4 199326
5 200321
6 200521
7 199115
8 199913
9 200811
10 200410
11 20037
12 20046
13 20075
14 19923
15 20133
16 20072
17 19891
18 19971
19 20020
20 20220

About Philip Carr

Philip Carr is a scholar working on Language and Linguistics, Linguistics and Language, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Cultural Studies, having authored 21 papers that have together received 362 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Phonetics and Phonology Research (6 papers), Linguistic Variation and Morphology (6 papers), Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation (4 papers), Historical Linguistics and Language Studies (3 papers), Language Development and Disorders (3 papers), Linguistics and Discourse Analysis (2 papers), Spanish Linguistics and Language Studies (2 papers) and Language and cultural evolution (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Linguistics and Language (155 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (234 citations), Language and Linguistics (165 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (86 citations) and Cultural Studies (24 citations). Philip Carr has collaborated with scholars based in France, United Kingdom and India. Frequent co-authors include Noël Burton-Roberts, Gerard Docherty, O. Kirichek, M. D. Atrey, Chris A. Johnson, Patrick Honeybone, Antonia V. Bennett, Allison M. Deal, Sydney Henson and Carrie Tompkins Stricker. Their work appears in journals such as Language Sciences, Journal of Linguistics, Lingua, International Journal of Bilingualism and Review of Scientific Instruments.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact