Donald Smith

31 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Hit Papers

KNOWLEDGE AND LOTTERIES 2005 · 624 citations
6240+7+14Years since publication200400600

Peers

Donald Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 144
  • Philosophy 630
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 412
  • Pharmaceutical Science 143
  • History and Philosophy of Science 102
  • Family Practice 39
Replace David Saunders with:
David Saunders United States
Mark Balaguer United States
Masato Ito Japan
John Palmer United States
Mark T. Nelson United Kingdom
Paul Needham Sweden
D. Zimmermann Germany
Martin Gardner Canada
H. Wendt United States
Donald Smith relative to David Saunders United States David Saunders's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×28.6×
David Saunders · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Donald Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Donald Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Donald Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Donald Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Donald Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Donald Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Donald Smith. The network helps show where Donald Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Donald Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Donald Smith Line = papers co-authored together Donald Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 34 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
KNOWLEDGE AND LOTTERIES
Hit paper breakdown →
2005624
2 1984124
3 1991117
4 2009113
5 1987113
6 200991
7 199129
8 200827
9 200525
10 195425
11 200323
12 199421
13 201518
14 198117
15 198716
16 19999
17
All This Stuff : Archiving the Artist
20138
18 20188
19 20066
20 19926

About Donald Smith

Donald Smith is a scholar working on Philosophy, Surgery, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Pharmaceutical Science and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, having authored 34 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy and Theoretical Science (4 papers), Diabetes Management and Research (3 papers), Drug Solubulity and Delivery Systems (3 papers), Free Will and Agency (2 papers), Diabetes and associated disorders (2 papers), Adhesion, Friction, and Surface Interactions (2 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (2 papers) and Pancreatic function and diabetes (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (630 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (412 citations), Pharmaceutical Science (143 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (102 citations) and Family Practice (39 citations). Donald Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Switzerland and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Lauretta Quinn, Ali Çınar, John H. Maddocks, Everett Hiestand, G. Binnig, Theodor W. Hänsch, Wolfgang M. Heckl, C. F. Quate, Jürgen P. Rabe and Christoph Gerber. Their work appears in journals such as Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, International Journal of Pharmaceutics, Poultry Science and Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact