Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 54th Annual Meeting
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w58793374 →Countries where authors are citing Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 54th Annual Meeting
This map shows the geographic impact of Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 54th Annual Meeting. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 54th Annual Meeting with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 54th Annual Meeting more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 54th Annual Meeting
This network shows the impact of Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 54th Annual Meeting. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 54th Annual Meeting.
About Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 54th Annual Meeting
This paper, published in 2010, received 524 indexed citations . Written by Annette Kluge, Björn Badura and Dina Burkolter covering the research area of Cognitive Neuroscience, Radiological and Ultrasound Technology and Social Psychology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Social Psychology (296 citations), Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality (74 citations) and Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (71 citations).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w58793374.