Diane L. Damos

47 papers receiving 346 citations

Peers

Diane L. Damos
Comparison fields: 5 of 88
  • Social Psychology 216
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 100
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 71
  • Aerospace Engineering 64
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 38
Replace Stephanie M. Doane with:
Stephanie M. Doane United States
Shaun Hutchins United States
Edward H. Bogart United States
Jefferson M. Koonce United States
Gabriella M. Hancock United States
Charlene K. Stokes United States
Immanuel Barshi United States
Annemarie Landman Netherlands
Daniel Lafond Canada
Grace Teo United States
Diane L. Damos relative to Stephanie M. Doane United States Stephanie M. Doane's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.4×
Stephanie M. Doane · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Diane L. Damos

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Diane L. Damos's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Diane L. Damos with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Diane L. Damos more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Diane L. Damos

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Diane L. Damos. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Diane L. Damos. The network helps show where Diane L. Damos may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Diane L. Damos

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Diane L. Damos. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Diane L. Damos based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Diane L. Damos. Diane L. Damos is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 20
2
Review of Aviator Selection
5
3
PILOT SELECTION SYSTEMS HELP PREDICT PERFORMANCE
4
4 7
5 14
6
Anti-retroviral therapy and cognitive function.
1
7 32
8
PRECURSOR SYSTEMS ANALYSES OF AUTOMATED HIGHWAY SYSTEM. FINAL REPORT. VOLUME IV: LATERAL AND LONGITUDINAL CONTROL ANALYSIS
1
9 1
10 11
11 4
12 6
13 3
14 7
15 1
16 59
17
Development of a Performance Evaluation Test for Environmental Research (PETER): Critical Tracking Test,
2
18 5
19 4
20 12

About Diane L. Damos

Diane L. Damos is a scholar working on Social Psychology, General Decision Sciences and Aerospace Engineering, having authored 50 papers that have together received 400 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Human-Automation Interaction and Safety (20 papers), Aerospace and Aviation Technology (7 papers) and Spatial Cognition and Navigation (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Social Psychology (216 citations), Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (30 citations) and Applied Psychology (28 citations). Diane L. Damos has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Czechia and New Zealand. Frequent co-authors include Christopher D. Wickens, Alvah C. Bittner, Richard S. John, Elizabeth S. Parker, Gavan Lintern, Robert S. Kennedy, E S Parker, Beverly H. Williges, Daniel Gopher and Robert C. Williges. Their work appears in journals such as SAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper series, Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society and Ergonomics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026