Diane Benford
- Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis top 2%
- Plant Science top 5%
- Food Science top 2%
- Molecular Biology
- Cancer Research top 10%
- Co-authors
- Johanna Fink‐GremmelsR. Woodrow SetzerJan AlexanderJames Winfred BridgesJean‐Charles LeblancAndrew CockburnEugenia DogliottiRolaf van Leeuwen
- Topics
- Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment (24 papers)Animal testing and alternatives (12 papers)Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals (11 papers)
- Journals
- American Journal of Clinical NutritionAnnals of the New York Academy of SciencesTrends in Food Science & Technology
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesNetherlands
In The Last Decade
Diane Benford
63 papers receiving 1.7k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 135
- Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 560
- Plant Science 367
- Food Science 338
- Molecular Biology 330
- Cancer Research 254
Countries citing papers authored by Diane Benford
This map shows the geographic impact of Diane Benford's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Diane Benford with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Diane Benford more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Diane Benford
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Diane Benford. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Diane Benford. The network helps show where Diane Benford may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Diane Benford
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Diane Benford. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Diane Benford based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Diane Benford. Diane Benford is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4 | |
| 2 | 30 | |
| 3 | 28 | |
| 4 | 110 | |
| 5 | 59 | |
| 6 | 151 | |
| 7 | 3 | |
| 8 | 24 | |
| 9 | 5 | |
| 10 | 11 | |
| 11 | 5 | |
| 12 | 5 | |
| 13 | 2 | |
| 14 | 4 | |
| 15 | 10 | |
| 16 | 22 | |
| 17 | 16 | |
| 18 | 2 | |
| 19 | 30 | |
| 20 | 1 |
About Diane Benford
Diane Benford is a scholar working on Cancer Research, Small Animals and Chemical Health and Safety, having authored 66 papers that have together received 1.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment (24 papers), Animal testing and alternatives (12 papers) and Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals (11 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (560 citations), Food Science (338 citations) and Cancer Research (254 citations). Diane Benford has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Johanna Fink‐Gremmels, R. Woodrow Setzer, Jan Alexander, James Winfred Bridges, Jean‐Charles Leblanc, Andrew Cockburn, Eugenia Dogliotti, Rolaf van Leeuwen, Jean‐Pierre Cravedi and Michael Dinovi. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences and Trends in Food Science & Technology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.