Diana van Bergen
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- Social Psychology top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science top 5%
- General Health Professions
- Health top 10%
- Co-authors
- Henny BosSawitri SaharsoJohannes H. SmitLaura BaamsAnton J.L.M. van BalkomT.V.M. PelsRoel BoskerAllard R. Feddes
- Topics
- Suicide and Self-Harm Studies (23 papers)LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy (13 papers)Migration, Health and Trauma (12 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaPLoS ONEAmerican Journal of Public Health
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsBelgiumUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Diana van Bergen
45 papers receiving 644 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
- Clinical Psychology 358
- Social Psychology 325
- Sociology and Political Science 282
- General Health Professions 78
- Health 68
Countries citing papers authored by Diana van Bergen
This map shows the geographic impact of Diana van Bergen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Diana van Bergen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Diana van Bergen more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Diana van Bergen
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Diana van Bergen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Diana van Bergen. The network helps show where Diana van Bergen may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Diana van Bergen
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Diana van Bergen. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Diana van Bergen based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Diana van Bergen. Diana van Bergen is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 3 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 2 | |
| 8 | 4 | |
| 9 | 4 | |
| 10 | 18 | |
| 11 | 6 | |
| 12 | 5 | |
| 13 | 27 | |
| 14 | 47 | |
| 15 | 23 | |
| 16 | 14 | |
| 17 | 42 | |
| 18 | 29 | |
| 19 | 29 | |
| 20 | [Review of: L. Sterckx, C. Bouw (2006) Liefde op maat. Over de partnerkeuze van Turkse en Marokkaanse jongeren] | 2 |
About Diana van Bergen
Diana van Bergen is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology and Leadership and Management, having authored 52 papers that have together received 667 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Suicide and Self-Harm Studies (23 papers), LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy (13 papers) and Migration, Health and Trauma (12 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (358 citations), Social Psychology (325 citations) and Health (68 citations). Diana van Bergen has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Belgium and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Henny Bos, Sawitri Saharso, Johannes H. Smit, Laura Baams, Anton J.L.M. van Balkom, T.V.M. Pels, Roel Bosker, Allard R. Feddes, Hans Grietens and Annemiek Huisman. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and American Journal of Public Health.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.