Tina Kretschmer

1.8k total citations
59 papers, 1.2k citations indexed

About

Tina Kretschmer is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology and Education. According to data from OpenAlex, Tina Kretschmer has authored 59 papers receiving a total of 1.2k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 41 papers in Clinical Psychology, 32 papers in Social Psychology and 14 papers in Education. Recurrent topics in Tina Kretschmer's work include Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (36 papers), Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression (22 papers) and Cognitive Abilities and Testing (8 papers). Tina Kretschmer is often cited by papers focused on Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (36 papers), Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression (22 papers) and Cognitive Abilities and Testing (8 papers). Tina Kretschmer collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands, United Kingdom and United States. Tina Kretschmer's co-authors include René Veenstra, Christina Salmivalli, Miranda Sentse, Albertine J. Oldehinkel, Rozemarijn van der Ploeg, Gijs Huitsing, Tessa M. L. Kaufman, Jan Kornelis Dijkstra, Alison Pike and Charlotte Vrijen and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and PEDIATRICS.

In The Last Decade

Tina Kretschmer

55 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Tina Kretschmer Netherlands 19 664 623 302 181 141 59 1.2k
Samantha Coyle United States 12 472 0.7× 621 1.0× 263 0.9× 235 1.3× 108 0.8× 25 1.0k
Alida Lo Coco Italy 19 634 1.0× 662 1.1× 293 1.0× 272 1.5× 155 1.1× 51 1.2k
Ingrid Obsuth United Kingdom 21 458 0.7× 905 1.5× 203 0.7× 235 1.3× 132 0.9× 62 1.2k
Sandra Tsang Hong Kong 20 312 0.5× 580 0.9× 271 0.9× 196 1.1× 121 0.9× 64 1.1k
Gaetana Affuso Italy 17 464 0.7× 561 0.9× 220 0.7× 170 0.9× 73 0.5× 42 933
Hannah L. Schacter United States 18 667 1.0× 570 0.9× 333 1.1× 234 1.3× 178 1.3× 48 1.1k
Carla Zappulla Italy 22 532 0.8× 836 1.3× 418 1.4× 286 1.6× 71 0.5× 48 1.3k
Michael L. Sulkowski United States 20 633 1.0× 755 1.2× 446 1.5× 321 1.8× 92 0.7× 63 1.5k
Yoshito Kawabata United States 18 857 1.3× 850 1.4× 370 1.2× 284 1.6× 105 0.7× 48 1.4k
Miranda Sentse Netherlands 21 884 1.3× 866 1.4× 439 1.5× 354 2.0× 241 1.7× 41 1.5k

Countries citing papers authored by Tina Kretschmer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Tina Kretschmer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tina Kretschmer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tina Kretschmer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Tina Kretschmer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tina Kretschmer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tina Kretschmer. The network helps show where Tina Kretschmer may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Tina Kretschmer

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Tina Kretschmer. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Tina Kretschmer based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Tina Kretschmer. Tina Kretschmer is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
3.
Kretschmer, Tina, Rozemarijn van der Ploeg, & Tessa M. L. Kaufman. (2024). Peer victimization in early adolescence and maladjustment in adulthood. European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry. 34(3). 1011–1024.
4.
Baams, Laura, et al.. (2024). A Systematic Review of Social Media Use and Adolescent Identity Development. Adolescent Research Review. 10(2). 219–236. 5 indexed citations
5.
Hartman, Catharina A., René Veenstra, Ilja M. Nolte, et al.. (2023). Gene-Environment Interplay in the Development of Overweight. Journal of Adolescent Health. 73(3). 574–581. 6 indexed citations
6.
Vrijen, Charlotte, et al.. (2022). Bullying perpetration and social status in the peer group: A meta‐analysis. Journal of Adolescence. 95(1). 34–55. 25 indexed citations
7.
Vrijen, Charlotte, et al.. (2022). Intergenerational Transmission of Peer Aggression. Journal of Youth and Adolescence. 51(10). 1901–1913. 1 indexed citations
8.
Parra, Luis A., et al.. (2021). Family Belongingness Attenuates Entrapment and Buffers Its Association with Suicidal Ideation in a Sample of Dutch Sexual Minority Emerging Adults. Archives of Sexual Behavior. 50(3). 983–1001. 6 indexed citations
9.
Kretschmer, Tina. (2021). The Value of Multiple-Generation Cohorts for Studying Parenting and Child Development. Child Development Perspectives. 15(2). 83–89. 4 indexed citations
11.
Kretschmer, Tina, et al.. (2021). Prevalence of overweight among Dutch primary school children living in JOGG and non-JOGG areas. PLoS ONE. 16(12). e0261406–e0261406. 8 indexed citations
12.
Kaufman, Tessa M. L., Tina Kretschmer, Gijs Huitsing, & René Veenstra. (2019). Caught in a vicious cycle? Explaining bidirectional spillover between parent-child relationships and peer victimization. Development and Psychopathology. 32(1). 11–20. 67 indexed citations
13.
Kretschmer, Tina, et al.. (2018). Interventions aimed at preventing and reducing overweight/obesity among children and adolescents: a meta‐synthesis. Obesity Reviews. 19(8). 1065–1079. 60 indexed citations
14.
Kretschmer, Tina, et al.. (2018). Causality and Pleiotropy in the Association Between Bullying Victimization in Adolescence and Depressive Episodes in Adulthood. Twin Research and Human Genetics. 21(1). 33–41. 10 indexed citations
15.
Ploeg, Rozemarijn van der, Tina Kretschmer, Christina Salmivalli, & René Veenstra. (2017). Defending victims: What does it take to intervene in bullying and how is it rewarded by peers?. Journal of School Psychology. 65. 1–10. 88 indexed citations
16.
Sentse, Miranda, Tina Kretschmer, Amaranta D. de Haan, & Peter Prinzie. (2016). Conduct Problem Trajectories Between Age 4 and 17 and Their Association with Behavioral Adjustment in Emerging Adulthood. Journal of Youth and Adolescence. 46(8). 1633–1642. 31 indexed citations
17.
Kretschmer, Tina, Miranda Sentse, Wim Meeus, et al.. (2015). Configurations of Adolescents' Peer Experiences: Associations With Parent–Child Relationship Quality and Parental Problem Behavior. Journal of Research on Adolescence. 26(3). 474–491. 17 indexed citations
18.
Kretschmer, Tina, Jan Kornelis Dijkstra, Johan Ormel, Frank C. Verhulst, & René Veenstra. (2013). Dopamine receptor D4 gene moderates the effect of positive and negative peer experiences on later delinquency: The Tracking Adolescents' Individual Lives Survey study. Development and Psychopathology. 25(4pt1). 1107–1117. 29 indexed citations
19.
Kretschmer, Tina, Matthew Hickman, Rita Doerner, et al.. (2013). Outcomes of childhood conduct problem trajectories in early adulthood: findings from the ALSPAC study. European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry. 23(7). 539–549. 67 indexed citations
20.
Pike, Alison, Tina Kretschmer, & Judith F. Dunn. (2009). Siblings - friends or foes?. Psychologist. 22(6). 494–496. 5 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026