Diana J. Day
- Rehabilitation top 5%
- Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery 7
- Neurology top 5%
- Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances 5
- Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies 2
- Neurology top 5%
- Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances 5
- Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies 2
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- Motor Control and Adaptation 2
- Internal Medicine top 10%
- Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management 3
-
- Acute Ischemic Stroke Management 14
- Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment 3
-
- Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases 3
- Co-authors
- P. Simon JonesJean‐Claude BaronElizabeth A. WarburtonT. Adrian CarpenterCinzia CalauttiMarcello NaccaratoTim D. FryerFranklin I. Aigbirhio
- Cited by
- RehabilitationNeurology
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesAustralia
In The Last Decade
Diana J. Day
22 papers receiving 724 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 81
- Rehabilitation 161
- Neurology 134
- Neurology 197
- Cognitive Neuroscience 204
- Internal Medicine 38
Countries citing papers authored by Diana J. Day
This map shows the geographic impact of Diana J. Day's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Diana J. Day with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Diana J. Day more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Diana J. Day
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Diana J. Day. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Diana J. Day. The network helps show where Diana J. Day may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Diana J. Day, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 3 | 2022 | 10 | |
| 4 | 2021 | 3 | |
| 5 | 2020 | 1 | |
| 6 | 2017 | 70 | |
| 7 | E-ASPECTS software is non-inferior to neuroradiologists in applying the ASPECTS score to CT scans of acute ischemic stroke patients | 2016 | 1 |
| 8 | 2016 | 22 | |
| 9 | 2016 | 4 | |
| 10 | 2015 | 17 | |
| 11 | 2015 | 11 | |
| 12 | 2014 | 30 | |
| 13 | 2011 | 15 | |
| 14 | 2009 | 118 | |
| 15 | 2008 | 71 | |
| 16 | 2006 | 71 | |
| 17 | 2006 | 139 | |
| 18 | 2005 | 54 | |
| 19 | 2002 | 48 | |
| 20 | 2002 | 12 |
About Diana J. Day
Diana J. Day is a scholar working on Rehabilitation, Internal Medicine and Epidemiology, having authored 23 papers that have together received 741 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Acute Ischemic Stroke Management (14 papers), Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (7 papers), Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances (5 papers), Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases (3 papers), Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment (3 papers), Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management (3 papers), Motor Control and Adaptation (2 papers) and Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Rehabilitation (161 citations), Neurology (134 citations) and Neurology (197 citations). Diana J. Day has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include P. Simon Jones, Jean‐Claude Baron, Elizabeth A. Warburton, T. Adrian Carpenter, Cinzia Calautti, Marcello Naccarato, Tim D. Fryer, Franklin I. Aigbirhio, Joseph V. Guadagno and Valerie M. Pomeroy. Their work appears in journals such as NeuroImage, Brain and Neurology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.