L. Esther de Graaf

1.2k citations
19 papers · 874 indexed · h-index 13

L. Esther de Graaf

17 papers receiving 842 citations

Peers

L. Esther de Graaf
Comparison fields: 5 of 95
  • Applied Psychology 433
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 406
  • Clinical Psychology 301
  • Social Psychology 258
  • General Health Professions 126
Replace Anna Geraedts with:
Anna Geraedts Netherlands
Dana Schultchen Germany
Fredrik Holländare Sweden
Adoración Castro Spain
Jiaxi Lin Germany
Chad D. Morris United States
Eva‐Lisa Petersson Sweden
Wouter van Ballegooijen Netherlands
Birgit Watzke Germany
Mitsuhiro Sado Japan
L. Esther de Graaf relative to Anna Geraedts Netherlands Anna Geraedts's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Anna Geraedts · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by L. Esther de Graaf

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of L. Esther de Graaf's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by L. Esther de Graaf with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites L. Esther de Graaf more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by L. Esther de Graaf

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by L. Esther de Graaf. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by L. Esther de Graaf. The network helps show where L. Esther de Graaf may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside L. Esther de Graaf, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with L. Esther de Graaf Line = papers co-authored together L. Esther de Graaf links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1 20250
2 20129
3 20122
4 20120
5 201264
6 20121
7 201129
8
Economic evaluation of online computerized cognitive behavioural therapy without support for depression in primary care: a randomized trial
201121
9 201035
10 201066
11 2010116
12 2010100
13 201040
14 2009141
15 200919
16 2009139
17 200965
18
[Introducing the diagnostic inventory for depression in the Netherlands].
20092
19 200825

About L. Esther de Graaf

L. Esther de Graaf is a scholar working on Applied Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Social Psychology, having authored 19 papers that have together received 874 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Digital Mental Health Interventions (8 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (8 papers), Mental Health Treatment and Access (6 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (5 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (3 papers), Pediatric Pain Management Techniques (2 papers), Pelvic floor disorders treatments (2 papers) and Infant Development and Preterm Care (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (433 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (406 citations) and Clinical Psychology (301 citations). L. Esther de Graaf has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Marcus J. H. Huibers, Arnoud Arntz, S.A.H. Gerhards, Jeffrey Roelofs, Silvia Evers, Heleen Riper, Guy Widdershoven, Job Metsemakers, JL Severens and Guy Widdershoven. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology and The British Journal of Psychiatry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026