Diana C. Parry

3.1k citations
69 papers · 2.1k · h-index 27

Impact in

Papers in

Diana C. Parry

67 papers receiving 2.0k citations

Peers

Diana C. Parry
Comparison fields: 5 of 120
  • Gender Studies 345
  • Social Psychology 693
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 415
  • Sociology and Political Science 942
  • Conservation 48
Replace Kimberly J. Shinew with:
Kimberly J. Shinew United States
Simone Fullagar Australia
Andrew Gorman‐Murray Australia
Yoshitaka Iwasaki Canada
Cassandra Phoenix United Kingdom
Troy D. Glover Canada
Peter J. Aspinall United Kingdom
Christine Milligan United Kingdom
Isabel Dyck Canada
Evanthia Lyons United Kingdom
Diana C. Parry relative to Kimberly J. Shinew United States Kimberly J. Shinew's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.4×
Kimberly J. Shinew · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Diana C. Parry

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Diana C. Parry's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Diana C. Parry with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Diana C. Parry more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Diana C. Parry

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Diana C. Parry. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Diana C. Parry. The network helps show where Diana C. Parry may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 19 scholars most cited alongside Diana C. Parry, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Diana C. Parry Line = papers co-authored together Diana C. Parry links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 69 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2004226
2 2005160
3 2004144
4 2004126
5 2007120
6 200876
7 200875
8 201264
9 200856
10 200652
11 200552
12 200551
13 200141
14 200541
15 201041
16 202041
17 200840
18 200540
19 201336
20 200433

About Diana C. Parry

Diana C. Parry is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology, Gender Studies, Clinical Psychology and Reproductive Medicine, having authored 69 papers that have together received 2.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Recreation, Leisure, Wilderness Management (23 papers), Sport and Mega-Event Impacts (14 papers), Gender, Feminism, and Media (12 papers), Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology (11 papers), Reproductive Health and Technologies (8 papers), Sports, Gender, and Society (7 papers), Adventure Sports and Sensation Seeking (6 papers) and Art Therapy and Mental Health (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gender Studies (345 citations), Social Psychology (693 citations), Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (415 citations), Sociology and Political Science (942 citations) and Conservation (48 citations). Diana C. Parry has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Troy D. Glover, Kimberly J. Shinew, Corey W. Johnson, Myron F. Floyd, William P. Stewart, Tracy Penny Light, Eric Filice, Brett Lashua, Simone Fullagar and R Barrington. Their work appears in journals such as Leisure Sciences, Journal of Leisure Research, Leisure Studies, Qualitative Inquiry and Sexualities.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact