Dian A. de Vries
- Sociology and Political Science top 2%
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- Literature and Literary Theory top 2%
- Education top 5%
- Applied Psychology top 5%
- Co-authors
- Jochen PeterRinaldo KühnePeter NikkenHanneke de GraafHelen G. M. VossenJin‐Liang WangDouglas A. GentileSkyler T. Hawk
- Topics
- Impact of Technology on Adolescents (6 papers)Eating Disorders and Behaviors (5 papers)Media Influence and Health (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsChinaUnited States
In The Last Decade
Dian A. de Vries
15 papers receiving 897 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
- Sociology and Political Science 579
- Clinical Psychology 463
- Literature and Literary Theory 186
- Education 155
- Applied Psychology 130
Countries citing papers authored by Dian A. de Vries
This map shows the geographic impact of Dian A. de Vries's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dian A. de Vries with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dian A. de Vries more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Dian A. de Vries
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dian A. de Vries. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dian A. de Vries. The network helps show where Dian A. de Vries may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Dian A. de Vries
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Dian A. de Vries. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Dian A. de Vries based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Dian A. de Vries. Dian A. de Vries is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | Digital Competence across the Lifespan | 1 |
| 4 | 24 | |
| 5 | 48 | |
| 6 | 82 | |
| 7 | 15 | |
| 8 | 7 | |
| 9 | 174 | |
| 10 | 5 | |
| 11 | Adolescents’ Social Network Site Use, Peer Appearance-Related Feedback, and Body Dissatisfaction: Testing a Mediation Modelbreakdown → | 230 |
| 12 | 181 | |
| 13 | 100 | |
| 14 | Social media and online self-presentation: Effects on how we see ourselves and our bodies | 2 |
| 15 | 71 |
About Dian A. de Vries
Dian A. de Vries is a scholar working on Applied Psychology, Marketing and Literature and Literary Theory, having authored 15 papers that have together received 943 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Impact of Technology on Adolescents (6 papers), Eating Disorders and Behaviors (5 papers) and Media Influence and Health (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (130 citations), Clinical Psychology (463 citations) and Communication (120 citations). Dian A. de Vries has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, China and United States. Frequent co-authors include Jochen Peter, Rinaldo Kühne, Peter Nikken, Hanneke de Graaf, Helen G. M. Vossen, Jin‐Liang Wang, Douglas A. Gentile, Skyler T. Hawk, Yan Zhang and Suzanna J. Opree. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Computers in Human Behavior and Personality and Individual Differences.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.