Hanneke de Graaf
- Clinical Psychology top 2%
- Sociology and Political Science top 5%
- General Health Professions top 5%
- Gender Studies top 5%
- Education top 5%
- Co-authors
- Peter NikkenJochen PeterDian A. de VriesSander BegeerJeroen DewinterIne VanwesenbeeckLiesbeth WoertmanWim Meeus
- Topics
- Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health (23 papers)Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology (10 papers)Child Abuse and Trauma (6 papers)
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsUnited StatesSweden
In The Last Decade
Hanneke de Graaf
49 papers receiving 1.0k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 83
- Clinical Psychology 638
- Sociology and Political Science 328
- General Health Professions 301
- Gender Studies 196
- Education 174
Countries citing papers authored by Hanneke de Graaf
This map shows the geographic impact of Hanneke de Graaf's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Hanneke de Graaf with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hanneke de Graaf more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Hanneke de Graaf
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Hanneke de Graaf. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Hanneke de Graaf. The network helps show where Hanneke de Graaf may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Hanneke de Graaf
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Hanneke de Graaf. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Hanneke de Graaf based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Hanneke de Graaf. Hanneke de Graaf is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4 | |
| 2 | 8 | |
| 3 | 4 | |
| 4 | 17 | |
| 5 | 21 | |
| 6 | 17 | |
| 7 | 12 | |
| 8 | 164 | |
| 9 | 5 | |
| 10 | Adolescents’ Social Network Site Use, Peer Appearance-Related Feedback, and Body Dissatisfaction: Testing a Mediation Modelbreakdown → | 230 |
| 11 | 7 | |
| 12 | 40 | |
| 13 | 48 | |
| 14 | 32 | |
| 15 | Opvoeding en seksuele ontwikkeling van adolescenten: Een literatuurstudie | 2 |
| 16 | 36 | |
| 17 | 68 | |
| 18 | 22 | |
| 19 | 19 | |
| 20 | 30 |
About Hanneke de Graaf
Hanneke de Graaf is a scholar working on Gender Studies, Clinical Psychology and General Health Professions, having authored 50 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health (23 papers), Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology (10 papers) and Child Abuse and Trauma (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (638 citations), Gender Studies (196 citations) and General Health Professions (301 citations). Hanneke de Graaf has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United States and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Peter Nikken, Jochen Peter, Dian A. de Vries, Sander Begeer, Jeroen Dewinter, Ine Vanwesenbeeck, Liesbeth Woertman, Wim Meeus, Suzanne Meijer and Jany Rademakers. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders and Frontiers in Psychology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.