Hanneke de Graaf

1.6k citations
50 papers · 1.1k indexed · 1 hit paper · h-index 17

Hanneke de Graaf

49 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Hit Papers

Adolescents’ Social Network Site Use, Peer Appearance-Rel...230201520262018202250100150200

Peers

Hanneke de Graaf
Comparison fields: 5 of 83
  • Clinical Psychology 638
  • Gender Studies 196
  • General Health Professions 301
  • Social Psychology 171
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 159
Replace Jacinthe Dion with:
Jacinthe Dion Canada
Allison Caruthers United States
Mons Bendixen Norway
Sandra L. Caron United States
Angela M. Neal United States
Andrew P. Smiler United States
Carl D. Sneed United States
F. Scott Christopher United States
Ann Merriwether United States
Thao Ha United States
Hanneke de Graaf relative to Jacinthe Dion Canada Jacinthe Dion's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Jacinthe Dion · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Hanneke de Graaf

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Hanneke de Graaf's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Hanneke de Graaf with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hanneke de Graaf more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Hanneke de Graaf

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Hanneke de Graaf. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Hanneke de Graaf. The network helps show where Hanneke de Graaf may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Hanneke de Graaf, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Hanneke de Graaf Line = papers co-authored together Hanneke de Graaf links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20234
2 20228
3 20224
4 202117
5 202021
6 201817
7 201812
8 2017164
9 20155
10
Adolescents’ Social Network Site Use, Peer Appearance-Related Feedback, and Body Dissatisfaction: Testing a Mediation Modelbreakdown →
2015230
11 20157
12 201440
13 201248
14 201132
15
Opvoeding en seksuele ontwikkeling van adolescenten: Een literatuurstudie
20092
16 200936
17 200768
18 200622
19 200619
20 200430

About Hanneke de Graaf

Hanneke de Graaf is a scholar working on Gender Studies, Clinical Psychology and General Health Professions, having authored 50 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health (23 papers), Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology (10 papers), Child Abuse and Trauma (6 papers), Sex work and related issues (6 papers), Gender Roles and Identity Studies (5 papers), Reproductive tract infections research (4 papers), Gender, Feminism, and Media (4 papers) and Sexual function and dysfunction studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (638 citations), Gender Studies (196 citations) and General Health Professions (301 citations). Hanneke de Graaf has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United States and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Peter Nikken, Jochen Peter, Dian A. de Vries, Sander Begeer, Jeroen Dewinter, Ine Vanwesenbeeck, Liesbeth Woertman, Wim Meeus, Suzanne Meijer and Jany Rademakers. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Sex Research, Journal of Youth and Adolescence, Archives of Sexual Behavior, Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders and Journal of Adolescent Health.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026