Anne Lazenbatt

1.2k total citations
67 papers, 819 citations indexed

About

Anne Lazenbatt is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Health and Sociology and Political Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Anne Lazenbatt has authored 67 papers receiving a total of 819 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 24 papers in Clinical Psychology, 23 papers in Health and 20 papers in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in Anne Lazenbatt's work include Child Abuse and Trauma (18 papers), Intimate Partner and Family Violence (17 papers) and Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse (12 papers). Anne Lazenbatt is often cited by papers focused on Child Abuse and Trauma (18 papers), Intimate Partner and Family Violence (17 papers) and Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse (12 papers). Anne Lazenbatt collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Ireland and Hong Kong. Anne Lazenbatt's co-authors include Ruth Freeman, Naomi Elliott, John Devaney, Lisa Bunting, Julie Taylor, Isla Wallace, Caroline Bradbury‐Jones, Kathy Rowe, Terence V. McCann and Ken Houston and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Computers & Education and Journal of Advanced Nursing.

In The Last Decade

Anne Lazenbatt

64 papers receiving 730 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Anne Lazenbatt United Kingdom 16 343 256 212 190 109 67 819
Jean Hughes Canada 18 268 0.8× 532 2.1× 162 0.8× 265 1.4× 90 0.8× 55 963
Diana L. Gustafson Canada 19 279 0.8× 294 1.1× 134 0.6× 337 1.8× 54 0.5× 52 981
Rozina Karmaliani Pakistan 18 375 1.1× 265 1.0× 295 1.4× 209 1.1× 214 2.0× 74 1.2k
Mengtong Chen Hong Kong 16 619 1.8× 264 1.0× 241 1.1× 299 1.6× 85 0.8× 47 1.1k
Marie Poggenpoel South Africa 17 460 1.3× 322 1.3× 125 0.6× 250 1.3× 66 0.6× 159 1.1k
Cathy Vaughan Australia 19 199 0.6× 312 1.2× 339 1.6× 378 2.0× 143 1.3× 100 1.0k
Michelle Bell United States 12 344 1.0× 257 1.0× 136 0.6× 165 0.9× 66 0.6× 23 1.1k
Allecia E. Reid United States 18 317 0.9× 381 1.5× 89 0.4× 309 1.6× 86 0.8× 43 1.1k
Francis Annor Ghana 19 581 1.7× 408 1.6× 258 1.2× 330 1.7× 38 0.3× 73 1.3k
Keith Brownlee Canada 17 401 1.2× 234 0.9× 77 0.4× 194 1.0× 70 0.6× 56 854

Countries citing papers authored by Anne Lazenbatt

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anne Lazenbatt's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anne Lazenbatt with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anne Lazenbatt more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anne Lazenbatt

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anne Lazenbatt. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anne Lazenbatt. The network helps show where Anne Lazenbatt may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Anne Lazenbatt

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Anne Lazenbatt. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Anne Lazenbatt based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Anne Lazenbatt. Anne Lazenbatt is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Bradbury‐Jones, Caroline, Jenna Breckenridge, John Devaney, et al.. (2015). Priorities and strategies for improving disabled women’s access to maternity services when they are affected by domestic abuse: a multi-method study using concept maps. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 15(1). 350–350. 11 indexed citations
2.
Taylor, Julie, et al.. (2015). Child maltreatment: pathway to chronic and long-term conditions?: Table 1. Journal of Public Health. 38(3). 426–431. 13 indexed citations
3.
Lazenbatt, Anne & John Devaney. (2014). Older Women Living with Domestic Violence: Coping Resources and Mental Health and Wellbeing. Journal of Clinical Nursing. 1(1). 10–22. 5 indexed citations
4.
Lazenbatt, Anne, et al.. (2014). Fear of childbirth’ and ways of coping for pregnant women and their partners during the birthing process: a salutogenic analysis. Research Portal (Queen's University Belfast). 12(3). 1–12. 21 indexed citations
5.
Devaney, John, Anne Lazenbatt, Lisa Bunting, et al.. (2014). The relationship between cumulative adversity in childhood and adolescent suicide and accidental death. Research Portal (Queen's University Belfast). 38(38). 15. 6 indexed citations
6.
Breckenridge, Jenna, John Devaney, Thilo Kroll, et al.. (2014). Access and utilisation of maternity care for disabled women who experience domestic abuse: a systematic review. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 14(1). 234–234. 20 indexed citations
7.
Taylor, Julie & Anne Lazenbatt. (2014). Child Maltreatment and High Risk Families. Medical Entomology and Zoology. 3 indexed citations
8.
Lazenbatt, Anne, et al.. (2013). Older women living and coping with domestic violence.. PubMed. 86(2). 28–32. 26 indexed citations
9.
Lazenbatt, Anne. (2009). An Evaluation of Case Management Review Processes in Northern Ireland and Scoping of Adverse Incident Reporting and Alternative Investigative Systems. Research Portal (Queen's University Belfast). 1 indexed citations
10.
Lazenbatt, Anne, John Devaney, & Lisa Bunting. (2009). An Evaluation of the Case Management Review Process in Northern Ireland. 1 indexed citations
11.
Themessl‐Huber, Markus, Anne Lazenbatt, & Julie Taylor. (2008). Overcoming health inequalities: a participative evaluation framework fit for the task. The Journal of the Royal Society for the Promotion of Health. 128(3). 117–122. 9 indexed citations
12.
Lazenbatt, Anne, et al.. (2008). A healthy settings framework: an evaluation and comparison of midwives’ responses to addressing domestic violence. Midwifery. 25(6). 622–636. 35 indexed citations
13.
Lazenbatt, Anne. (2005). Methodological issues in nursing research: rigour and grounded theory. Australian journal of advanced nursing. 48–52. 4 indexed citations
14.
Elliott, Naomi & Anne Lazenbatt. (2005). HOW TO RECOGNISE A ‘QUALITY’ GROUNDED THEORY RESEARCH STUDY. Australian journal of advanced nursing. 22(3). 92 indexed citations
15.
Clark, Eileen, Terence V. McCann, Kathy Rowe, & Anne Lazenbatt. (2004). Cognitive dissonance and undergraduate nursing students’ knowledge of, and attitudes about, smoking. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 46(6). 586–594. 50 indexed citations
16.
Lazenbatt, Anne, et al.. (2004). Child physical abuse: health professionals’ perceptions, diagnosis and responses. British Journal of Community Nursing. 9(8). 332–339. 31 indexed citations
17.
Lazenbatt, Anne, et al.. (2001). Inequalities in health: Evaluation and effectiveness in practice. International Journal of Nursing Practice. 7(6). 383–391. 5 indexed citations
18.
Lazenbatt, Anne, et al.. (1999). A strategy to target the health needs of prostitutes. British Journal of Community Nursing. 4(4). 167–173. 1 indexed citations
19.
Houston, Ken & Anne Lazenbatt. (1996). The Introduction and Evaluation of Peer‐Tutoring in Undergraduate Courses. Journal of Further and Higher Education. 20(1). 39–50. 5 indexed citations
20.
Lazenbatt, Anne, et al.. (1991). An evaluation of the Ulster Cancer Foundation's Nurses and Smoking Package and its impact on student nurses. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 16(12). 1428–1438. 9 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026