Anne Lazenbatt
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- General Health Professions top 5%
- Health top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health top 10%
- Co-authors
- Ruth FreemanNaomi ElliottJohn DevaneyLisa BuntingJulie TaylorIsla WallaceCaroline Bradbury‐JonesKen Houston
- Topics
- Child Abuse and Trauma (18 papers)Intimate Partner and Family Violence (17 papers)Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse (12 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaComputers & EducationJournal of Advanced Nursing
- Partner nations
- United KingdomIrelandHong Kong
In The Last Decade
Anne Lazenbatt
64 papers receiving 730 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 103
- Clinical Psychology 343
- General Health Professions 256
- Health 212
- Sociology and Political Science 190
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 109
Countries citing papers authored by Anne Lazenbatt
This map shows the geographic impact of Anne Lazenbatt's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anne Lazenbatt with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anne Lazenbatt more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Anne Lazenbatt
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anne Lazenbatt. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anne Lazenbatt. The network helps show where Anne Lazenbatt may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Anne Lazenbatt
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Anne Lazenbatt. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Anne Lazenbatt based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Anne Lazenbatt. Anne Lazenbatt is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 11 | |
| 2 | 13 | |
| 3 | 24 | |
| 4 | Older Women Living with Domestic Violence: Coping Resources and Mental Health and Wellbeing | 5 |
| 5 | The relationship between cumulative adversity in childhood and adolescent suicide and accidental death | 6 |
| 6 | Fear of childbirth’ and ways of coping for pregnant women and their partners during the birthing process: a salutogenic analysis | 21 |
| 7 | 20 | |
| 8 | 10 | |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | 16 | |
| 11 | 35 | |
| 12 | 9 | |
| 13 | 107 | |
| 14 | 92 | |
| 15 | Methodological issues in nursing research: rigour and grounded theory | 4 |
| 16 | 50 | |
| 17 | 5 | |
| 18 | 8 | |
| 19 | 5 | |
| 20 | 9 |
About Anne Lazenbatt
Anne Lazenbatt is a scholar working on Health, Clinical Psychology and Obstetrics and Gynecology, having authored 67 papers that have together received 819 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Child Abuse and Trauma (18 papers), Intimate Partner and Family Violence (17 papers) and Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse (12 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health (212 citations), Clinical Psychology (343 citations) and Public Administration (36 citations). Anne Lazenbatt has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Ireland and Hong Kong. Frequent co-authors include Ruth Freeman, Naomi Elliott, John Devaney, Lisa Bunting, Julie Taylor, Isla Wallace, Caroline Bradbury‐Jones, Ken Houston, Eileen Clark and Kathy Rowe. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Computers & Education and Journal of Advanced Nursing.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.