Denise Návia

2.4k citations
126 papers · 1.7k indexed · h-index 23

Impact in

Papers in

Denise Návia

117 papers receiving 1.7k citations

Peers

Denise Návia
Comparison fields: 5 of 53
  • Insect Science 1.5k
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 843
  • Plant Science 785
  • Endocrinology 68
  • Horticulture 8
Replace James W. Amrine with:
James W. Amrine United States
Carl C. Childers United States
David J. Voegtlin United States
Anna Skoracka Poland
Umberto Bernardo Italy
John K. Moulton United States
William D. J. Kirk United Kingdom
Paul F. Rugman‐Jones United States
Qiang Xie China
Alain Migeon France
Denise Návia relative to James W. Amrine United States James W. Amrine's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
James W. Amrine · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Denise Návia

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Denise Návia's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Denise Návia with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Denise Návia more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Denise Návia

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Denise Návia. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Denise Návia. The network helps show where Denise Návia may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Denise Návia, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Denise Návia Line = papers co-authored together Denise Návia links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20250
2 20250
3 20240
4 20243
5 20244
6 20236
7 20230
8 20231
9 20199
10 201910
11 20186
12 20163
13 201421
14 201223
15 201153
16 201169
17 201013
18 200990
19 200726
20
Mites (Acari) of the genus Notostrix Keifer (Eriophyidae): new records, description of six new species and key to the world species
20037

About Denise Návia

Denise Návia is a scholar working on Insect Science, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Plant Science, Horticulture and Endocrinology, having authored 126 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (112 papers), Study of Mite Species (49 papers), Insect and Pesticide Research (37 papers), Plant and animal studies (24 papers), Plant Virus Research Studies (21 papers), Forest Insect Ecology and Management (12 papers), Research on scale insects (9 papers) and Hymenoptera taxonomy and phylogeny (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (1.5k citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (843 citations), Plant Science (785 citations), Endocrinology (68 citations) and Horticulture (8 citations). Denise Návia has collaborated with scholars based in Brazil, France and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Gilberto J. de Morães, Renata Santos de Mendonça, Francisco Ferragut, Carlos H. W. Flechtmann, Anna Skoracka, Manoel G. C. Gondim, Maria Navajas, Antônio C. Lofego, G. Truol and Ronald Ochoa. Their work appears in journals such as Experimental and Applied Acarology, Zootaxa, Systematic and Applied Acarology, Acarologia and Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026