Systematic and Applied Acarology

1.9k papers and 9.9k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.9k papers published in Systematic and Applied Acarology in the last decades have received a total of 9.9k indexed citations. Papers published in Systematic and Applied Acarology usually cover Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (1.5k papers), Insect Science (1.3k papers) and Parasitology (428 papers) specifically the topics of Study of Mite Species (1.3k papers), Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (1.2k papers) and Insect and Pesticide Research (497 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Systematic and Applied Acarology are Zhi‐Qiang Zhang, Gilberto J. de Morães, Sergey G. Ermilov, J. A. McMurtry, Nazer Famah Sourassou, Ryszard Haitlinger, Alireza Saboori, Robert Cruickshank, Yaghoub Fathipour and Qing‐Hai Fan.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Systematic and Applied Acarology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Systematic and Applied Acarology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Systematic and Applied Acarology.

Countries where authors publish in Systematic and Applied Acarology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Systematic and Applied Acarology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Systematic and Applied Acarology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Systematic and Applied Acarology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025