Antônio C. Lofego
- Insect Science top 0.5%
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics top 1%
- Plant Science top 10%
- Infectious Diseases
- Ecology
- Co-authors
- Gilberto J. de MorãesReinaldo J. F. FeresPeterson R. DemiteA. R. OliveiraDenise NáviaSerge KreiterR. OchoaManoel G. C. Gondim
- Topics
- Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (86 papers)Insect and Pesticide Research (60 papers)Study of Mite Species (60 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaAnnals of the Entomological Society of AmericaAnimals
- Partner nations
- BrazilUnited StatesAustralia
In The Last Decade
Antônio C. Lofego
94 papers receiving 981 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 31
- Insect Science 913
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 708
- Plant Science 324
- Infectious Diseases 35
- Ecology 30
Countries citing papers authored by Antônio C. Lofego
This map shows the geographic impact of Antônio C. Lofego's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Antônio C. Lofego with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Antônio C. Lofego more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Antônio C. Lofego
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Antônio C. Lofego. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Antônio C. Lofego. The network helps show where Antônio C. Lofego may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Antônio C. Lofego
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Antônio C. Lofego. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Antônio C. Lofego based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Antônio C. Lofego. Antônio C. Lofego is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 3 | |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | 3 | |
| 8 | 3 | |
| 9 | 4 | |
| 10 | 5 | |
| 11 | 3 | |
| 12 | 15 | |
| 13 | 15 | |
| 14 | 7 | |
| 15 | 21 | |
| 16 | 26 | |
| 17 | 15 | |
| 18 | First report of mites Amblyseiella setosa Muma (Phytoseiidae) and Tuckerella pavoniformis (Ewing) (Tuckerellidae) in Brazil. | 2 |
| 19 | 5 | |
| 20 | Plant mites (Acari) of the French Antilles. 3. Phytoseiidae (Gamasida) | 51 |
About Antônio C. Lofego
Antônio C. Lofego is a scholar working on Insect Science, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and Parasitology, having authored 96 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (86 papers), Insect and Pesticide Research (60 papers) and Study of Mite Species (60 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (913 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (708 citations) and Plant Science (324 citations). Antônio C. Lofego has collaborated with scholars based in Brazil, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Gilberto J. de Morães, Reinaldo J. F. Feres, Peterson R. Demite, A. R. Oliveira, Denise Návia, Serge Kreiter, R. Ochoa, Manoel G. C. Gondim, Ronald Ochoa and Carlos H. W. Flechtmann. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Annals of the Entomological Society of America and Animals.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.