Denise Campbell‐Scherer

3.5k citations
69 papers · 1.1k indexed · h-index 19

Denise Campbell‐Scherer

64 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Denise Campbell‐Scherer
Comparison fields: 5 of 125
  • Pharmacy 266
  • General Health Professions 385
  • Family Practice 24
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 287
  • Health Information Management 43
Replace Åsa Hörnsten with:
Åsa Hörnsten Sweden
Linda Kinsinger United States
Abdulla Al Sayyari Saudi Arabia
Sulaiman Alshammari Saudi Arabia
Jane Desborough Australia
Muir Gray United Kingdom
Santanu Datta United States
Arieh Riskin Israel
Shreya Kangovi United States
WY Cheung United Kingdom
Denise Campbell‐Scherer relative to Åsa Hörnsten Sweden Åsa Hörnsten's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Åsa Hörnsten · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Denise Campbell‐Scherer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Denise Campbell‐Scherer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Denise Campbell‐Scherer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Denise Campbell‐Scherer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Denise Campbell‐Scherer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Denise Campbell‐Scherer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Denise Campbell‐Scherer. The network helps show where Denise Campbell‐Scherer may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Denise Campbell‐Scherer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Denise Campbell‐Scherer Line = papers co-authored together Denise Campbell‐Scherer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20250
2 20240
3 20231
4 20231
5 20230
6 202214
7 20219
8 20212
9 202018
10 201930
11 201913
12 201810
13
Examining Accuracy of Self-Assessment of In-Training Examination Performance in a Context of Guided Self-Assessment.
20172
14
Assessing family history of chronic disease in primary care: Prevalence, documentation, and appropriate screening.
201716
15 201712
16 201735
17 201419
18 201432
19 201445
20
Oxidation of Phossy Water by Ozone.
19771

About Denise Campbell‐Scherer

Denise Campbell‐Scherer is a scholar working on Pharmacy, General Health Professions and Health Information Management, having authored 69 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Obesity and Health Practices (27 papers), Primary Care and Health Outcomes (19 papers), Chronic Disease Management Strategies (13 papers), Health Policy Implementation Science (12 papers), Health Promotion and Cardiovascular Prevention (11 papers), Diabetes Management and Education (7 papers), Clinical practice guidelines implementation (6 papers) and Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacy (266 citations), General Health Professions (385 citations) and Family Practice (24 citations). Denise Campbell‐Scherer has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Philipp Dahm, Shahnaz Sultan, Charles D. Scales, P.J. Devereaux, Arya M. Sharma, Thea Luig, Ayodele A. Ogunleye, Donna Manca, Andrew Cave and Lee A. Green. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, BMJ and The Journal of Urology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026