Dawn Schroeder
Impact in
- Applied Psychology top 2%
- Behavioral Health and Interventions
- Optimism, Hope, and Well-being
- Oncology top 10%
- Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
- Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
Papers in
-
- Health Policy Implementation Science 2
- Health Literacy and Information Accessibility 1
- Oncology 3
- Global Cancer Incidence and Screening 3
- Co-authors
- Kevin D. McCaul (4 shared papers)Russell E. Glasgow (2 shared papers)Patricia A. Reid (2 shared papers)Wendy Duggleby (2 shared papers)Cheryl Nekolaichuk (1 shared paper)Thea Luig (2 shared papers)Sanjay Beesoon (2 shared papers)Denise Campbell‐Scherer (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Health Psychology (4 papers)BMC Geriatrics (1 paper)BMJ Open (1 paper)Cancer Nursing (1 paper)Clinical journal of oncology nursing (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- CanadaUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Dawn Schroeder
9 papers receiving 884 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
- Applied Psychology 261
- Oncology 436
- Genetics 329
- General Decision Sciences 16
- General Health Professions 213
Countries citing papers authored by Dawn Schroeder
This map shows the geographic impact of Dawn Schroeder's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dawn Schroeder with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dawn Schroeder more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Dawn Schroeder
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dawn Schroeder. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dawn Schroeder. The network helps show where Dawn Schroeder may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 11 scholars most cited alongside Dawn Schroeder, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1996 | 302 | |
| 2 | 1996 | 253 | |
| 3 | 1996 | 158 | |
| 4 | 1996 | 140 | |
| 5 | 2013 | 26 | |
| 6 | 2022 | 20 | |
| 7 | 2016 | 6 | |
| 8 | 2015 | 3 | |
| 9 | 2021 | 2 |
About Dawn Schroeder
Dawn Schroeder is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Oncology, Genetics, Sociology and Political Science and Applied Psychology, having authored 9 papers that have together received 910 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include BRCA gene mutations in cancer (3 papers), Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (3 papers), Health Policy Implementation Science (2 papers), Family Support in Illness (2 papers), Health Literacy and Information Accessibility (1 paper), Healthcare Quality and Management (1 paper), Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development (1 paper) and Optimism, Hope, and Well-being (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (261 citations), Oncology (436 citations), Genetics (329 citations), General Decision Sciences (16 citations) and General Health Professions (213 citations). Dawn Schroeder has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Kevin D. McCaul, Russell E. Glasgow, Patricia A. Reid, Wendy Duggleby, Cheryl Nekolaichuk, Thea Luig, Sanjay Beesoon, Denise Campbell‐Scherer, Tracy Finch and Brenda L. Cameron. Their work appears in journals such as Health Psychology, BMC Geriatrics, BMJ Open, Cancer Nursing and Clinical journal of oncology nursing.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.