Dawn Schroeder

1.1k total citations
9 papers, 910 citations indexed

About

Dawn Schroeder is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Oncology and Genetics. According to data from OpenAlex, Dawn Schroeder has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 910 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 3 papers in General Health Professions, 3 papers in Oncology and 3 papers in Genetics. Recurrent topics in Dawn Schroeder's work include BRCA gene mutations in cancer (3 papers), Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (3 papers) and Health Policy Implementation Science (2 papers). Dawn Schroeder is often cited by papers focused on BRCA gene mutations in cancer (3 papers), Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (3 papers) and Health Policy Implementation Science (2 papers). Dawn Schroeder collaborates with scholars based in Canada, United States and United Kingdom. Dawn Schroeder's co-authors include Kevin D. McCaul, Russell E. Glasgow, Patricia A. Reid, Wendy Duggleby, Cheryl Nekolaichuk, Sanjay Beesoon, Denise Campbell‐Scherer, Tracy Finch, Thea Luig and Brenda L. Cameron and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Health Psychology and BMJ Open.

In The Last Decade

Dawn Schroeder

9 papers receiving 884 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Dawn Schroeder Canada	7	436	329	261	259	213	9	910
Almut Helmes Germany	15	231 0.5×	157 0.5×	126 0.5×	172 0.7×	376 1.8×	24	899
Colleen Burke Sands United States	13	562 1.3×	877 2.7×	124 0.5×	506 2.0×	199 0.9×	18	1.4k
Ting Hsiang Lin United States	8	130 0.3×	389 1.2×	97 0.4×	201 0.8×	64 0.3×	11	638
Catherine A. Perz United States	10	127 0.3×	149 0.5×	154 0.6×	89 0.3×	124 0.6×	11	702
Lisa Kan Canada	17	721 1.7×	103 0.3×	60 0.2×	154 0.6×	138 0.6×	32	1.1k
Janet Seay United States	7	309 0.7×	299 0.9×	34 0.1×	134 0.5×	215 1.0×	9	717
Pamela S. Sinicrope United States	16	157 0.4×	156 0.5×	45 0.2×	103 0.4×	138 0.6×	48	593
Jiahui Wong Canada	15	298 0.7×	221 0.7×	50 0.2×	175 0.7×	118 0.6×	45	926
Suzanne M. Miller United States	4	142 0.3×	111 0.3×	47 0.2×	103 0.4×	179 0.8×	6	508
Janice Tzeng United States	15	126 0.3×	127 0.4×	57 0.2×	67 0.3×	190 0.9×	33	645

Countries citing papers authored by Dawn Schroeder

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Dawn Schroeder's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dawn Schroeder with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dawn Schroeder more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Dawn Schroeder

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dawn Schroeder. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dawn Schroeder. The network helps show where Dawn Schroeder may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Dawn Schroeder

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Dawn Schroeder. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Dawn Schroeder based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Dawn Schroeder. Dawn Schroeder is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

9 of 9 papers shown

Schroeder, Dawn, Thea Luig, Tracy Finch, Sanjay Beesoon, & Denise Campbell‐Scherer. (2022). Understanding implementation context and social processes through integrating Normalization Process Theory (NPT) and the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 3(1). 13–13. 20 indexed citations

Schroeder, Dawn, et al.. (2021). What work is required to implement and sustain the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP)? A qualitative study of NSQIP implementation in Alberta, Canada. BMJ Open. 11(9). e044720–e044720. 2 indexed citations

Schroeder, Dawn, Wendy Duggleby, & Brenda L. Cameron. (2016). Moving In and Out of the What-Ifs. Cancer Nursing. 40(5). 386–393. 6 indexed citations

Schroeder, Dawn, et al.. (2015). Breast Cancer Genetic Testing: More Than a Medical Management Tool. Clinical journal of oncology nursing. 19(5). 603–607. 3 indexed citations

Duggleby, Wendy, Dawn Schroeder, & Cheryl Nekolaichuk. (2013). Hope and connection: the experience of family caregivers of persons with dementia living in a long term care facility. BMC Geriatrics. 13(1). 112–112. 26 indexed citations

McCaul, Kevin D., Dawn Schroeder, & Patricia A. Reid. (1996). Breast cancer worry and screening: Some prospective data.. Health Psychology. 15(6). 430–433. 158 indexed citations

McCaul, Kevin D., et al.. (1996). What is the relationship between breast cancer risk and mammography screening? A meta-analytic review.. Health Psychology. 15(6). 423–429. 302 indexed citations

McCaul, Kevin D., et al.. (1996). What is the relationship between breast cancer risk and mammography screening? A meta-analytic review.. Health Psychology. 15(6). 423–429. 253 indexed citations

McCaul, Kevin D., Dawn Schroeder, & Patricia A. Reid. (1996). Breast cancer worry and screening: Some prospective data.. Health Psychology. 15(6). 430–433. 140 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact