Debra Revere

1.6k citations
66 papers · 1.1k indexed · h-index 17

Debra Revere

64 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Debra Revere
Comparison fields: 5 of 130
  • Health Information Management 158
  • Medical Terminology 8
  • General Health Professions 492
  • Applied Psychology 86
  • Family Practice 29
Replace Mahnaz Samadbeik with:
Mahnaz Samadbeik Iran
D. Keith McInnes United States
Joshua E. Richardson United States
Lynn Etheredge United States
Lisa Grossman Liu United States
Ronen Rozenblum United States
Stephanie L. Shimada United States
Tomislav Bokun Croatia
Chantelle Anandan United Kingdom
Julie Payne-Gagnon Canada
Debra Revere relative to Mahnaz Samadbeik Iran Mahnaz Samadbeik's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.5×
Mahnaz Samadbeik · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Debra Revere

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Debra Revere's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Debra Revere with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Debra Revere more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Debra Revere

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Debra Revere. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Debra Revere. The network helps show where Debra Revere may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Debra Revere, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Debra Revere Line = papers co-authored together Debra Revere links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20240
2 20225
3 20216
4 20201
5 201926
6 201818
7 201813
8 201815
9 201830
10 201729
11 20112
12 201113
13 20105
14 201011
15 20102
16 200832
17 2007141
18
Modeling a Concept-based Information System to Promote Scientific Discovery: The Telemakus System.
20024
19
Using Contextual Inquiry to Inform Design of a Clinical Information Tool.
20014
20
Implementation of a Phase I Clinical Information Tool Using Contextual Inquiry Outcomes.
20011

About Debra Revere

Debra Revere is a scholar working on Health Information Management, Issues, ethics and legal aspects and General Health Professions, having authored 66 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Data-Driven Disease Surveillance (20 papers), Electronic Health Records Systems (10 papers), Public Health Policies and Education (9 papers), Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies (8 papers), Mobile Health and mHealth Applications (8 papers), Advanced Text Analysis Techniques (5 papers), Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods (5 papers) and Data Quality and Management (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health Information Management (158 citations), Medical Terminology (8 citations) and General Health Professions (492 citations). Debra Revere has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Zimbabwe and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Peter J. Dunbar, Janet Baseman, James D. Ralston, Lynne Robins, Harold I. Goldberg, Sherrilynne S. Fuller, Anne M. Turner, Ian Painter, Shaun J. Grannis and Neil Rambo. Their work appears in journals such as BMC Public Health, Public Health Reports, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, BMJ Open and BMC Health Services Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026