Debra C. Gash

1.9k total citations · 1 hit paper
6 papers, 1.3k citations indexed

About

Debra C. Gash is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Strategy and Management and Management Information Systems. According to data from OpenAlex, Debra C. Gash has authored 6 papers receiving a total of 1.3k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 3 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 2 papers in Strategy and Management and 2 papers in Management Information Systems. Recurrent topics in Debra C. Gash's work include Information Systems Theories and Implementation (3 papers), Complex Systems and Decision Making (2 papers) and Human Resource Development and Performance Evaluation (2 papers). Debra C. Gash is often cited by papers focused on Information Systems Theories and Implementation (3 papers), Complex Systems and Decision Making (2 papers) and Human Resource Development and Performance Evaluation (2 papers). Debra C. Gash collaborates with scholars based in United States and France. Debra C. Gash's co-authors include Wanda J. Orlikowski and Ellen Ernst Kossek and has published in prestigious journals such as Human Resource Management, ACM Transactions on Information Systems and DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology).

In The Last Decade

Debra C. Gash

5 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

Technological frames

1994 1.2k citations Wanda J. Orlikowski, Debra C. Gash ACM Transactions on Information Systems profile →

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Debra C. Gash United States	4	590	282	272	262	193	6	1.3k
Janice I. DeGross United States	13	457 0.8×	258 0.9×	169 0.6×	186 0.7×	235 1.2×	39	1.1k
Neil C. Ramiller United States	15	487 0.8×	349 1.2×	179 0.7×	376 1.4×	167 0.9×	35	1.2k
Athanasia Pouloudi Greece	20	397 0.7×	280 1.0×	249 0.9×	295 1.1×	269 1.4×	82	1.4k
Olga Volkoff Canada	13	708 1.2×	707 2.5×	252 0.9×	396 1.5×	325 1.7×	22	1.9k
Joe Nandhakumar United Kingdom	23	638 1.1×	481 1.7×	276 1.0×	460 1.8×	174 0.9×	75	1.9k
Traci Carte United States	15	306 0.5×	280 1.0×	377 1.4×	189 0.7×	177 0.9×	49	1.2k
Claudio U. Ciborra Italy	17	773 1.3×	752 2.7×	320 1.2×	486 1.9×	143 0.7×	27	1.9k
Tom Butler Ireland	20	301 0.5×	277 1.0×	196 0.7×	303 1.2×	172 0.9×	73	1.3k
Claudio Ciborra Italy	15	376 0.6×	315 1.1×	120 0.4×	270 1.0×	130 0.7×	29	1.1k
Ali F. Farhoomand Hong Kong	14	402 0.7×	382 1.4×	179 0.7×	264 1.0×	556 2.9×	45	1.2k

Countries citing papers authored by Debra C. Gash

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Debra C. Gash's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Debra C. Gash with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Debra C. Gash more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Debra C. Gash

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Debra C. Gash. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Debra C. Gash. The network helps show where Debra C. Gash may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Debra C. Gash

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Debra C. Gash. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Debra C. Gash based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Debra C. Gash. Debra C. Gash is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

6 of 6 papers shown

1.

Orlikowski, Wanda J. & Debra C. Gash. (2011). Changing frames--understanding technological change in organizations. DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology). 13 indexed citations

2.

Orlikowski, Wanda J. & Debra C. Gash. (1994). Technological frames. ACM Transactions on Information Systems. 12(2). 174–207. 1172 indexed citations breakdown →

3.

Kossek, Ellen Ernst, et al.. (1994). Waiting for innovation in the human resources department: Godot implements a human resource information system. Human Resource Management. 33(1). 135–159. 63 indexed citations

4.

Gash, Debra C. & Wanda J. Orlikowski. (1991). CHANGING FRAMES: TOWARDS AN UNDERSTANDING OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND ORGANIZATIONAL CHANGE.. Academy of Management Proceedings. 1991(1). 189–193. 20 indexed citations

5.

Gash, Debra C. & Ellen Ernst Kossek. (1989). Links between organizational systems, human resource strategy, and end user training. 68. 96–105 vol.4. 2 indexed citations

6.

Gash, Debra C.. (1988). Negotiating IS: Observations on changes in structure from a negotiated order perspective. 176–182. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact