Dearbhail Bracken‐Roche
- General Health Professions top 10%
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
- Sociology and Political Science
- Clinical Psychology
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
- Topics
- Ethics in Clinical Research (4 papers)Biomedical Ethics and Regulation (3 papers)Ethics in medical practice (3 papers)
- Cited by
- General Health ProfessionsPublic Health, Environmental and Occupational HealthClinical Psychology
- Journals
- The Canadian Journal of PsychiatryHandbook of clinical neurologyHealth Research Policy and Systems
- Partner nations
- CanadaUnited States
In The Last Decade
Dearbhail Bracken‐Roche
6 papers receiving 248 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 85
- General Health Professions 117
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 103
- Sociology and Political Science 69
- Clinical Psychology 60
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 27
Countries citing papers authored by Dearbhail Bracken‐Roche
This map shows the geographic impact of Dearbhail Bracken‐Roche's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dearbhail Bracken‐Roche with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dearbhail Bracken‐Roche more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Dearbhail Bracken‐Roche
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dearbhail Bracken‐Roche. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dearbhail Bracken‐Roche. The network helps show where Dearbhail Bracken‐Roche may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Dearbhail Bracken‐Roche
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Dearbhail Bracken‐Roche. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Dearbhail Bracken‐Roche based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Dearbhail Bracken‐Roche. Dearbhail Bracken‐Roche is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 15 | |
| 2 | 9 | |
| 3 | 23 | |
| 4 | 172 | |
| 5 | 30 | |
| 6 | 12 |
About Dearbhail Bracken‐Roche
Dearbhail Bracken‐Roche is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Radiological and Ultrasound Technology and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 6 papers that have together received 261 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ethics in Clinical Research (4 papers), Biomedical Ethics and Regulation (3 papers) and Ethics in medical practice (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Health Professions (117 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (103 citations) and Clinical Psychology (60 citations). Dearbhail Bracken‐Roche has collaborated with scholars based in Canada and United States. Frequent co-authors include Éric Racine, Mary Ellen Macdonald, Emily Bell, Emily Bell, Michael Shevell and Emily Bell. Their work appears in journals such as The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, Handbook of clinical neurology and Health Research Policy and Systems.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.