Handbook of clinical neurology

3.4k papers and 62.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 3.4k papers published in Handbook of clinical neurology in the last decades have received a total of 62.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Handbook of clinical neurology usually cover Neurology (1.0k papers), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (617 papers) and Psychiatry and Mental health (558 papers) specifically the topics of Genetic Neurodegenerative Diseases (255 papers), Neurological disorders and treatments (249 papers) and Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments (197 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Handbook of clinical neurology are Douglas S. Goodin, Henry L. Paulson, Gábor G. Kovács, Ann C. McKee, George F. Koob, Daniel H. Daneshvar, Richard L. Doty, Andreas Schulze, Margaret M. Faul and Victor G. Coronado.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Handbook of clinical neurology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Handbook of clinical neurology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Handbook of clinical neurology.

Countries where authors publish in Handbook of clinical neurology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Handbook of clinical neurology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Handbook of clinical neurology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Handbook of clinical neurology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025