Anne M. Stone

487 total citations
22 papers, 350 citations indexed

About

Anne M. Stone is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, General Health Professions and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. According to data from OpenAlex, Anne M. Stone has authored 22 papers receiving a total of 350 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 6 papers in General Health Professions and 6 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. Recurrent topics in Anne M. Stone's work include Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (5 papers), Family Support in Illness (4 papers) and Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (3 papers). Anne M. Stone is often cited by papers focused on Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (5 papers), Family Support in Illness (4 papers) and Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (3 papers). Anne M. Stone collaborates with scholars based in United States and Ireland. Anne M. Stone's co-authors include Allison M. Scott, Dale E. Brashers, Ashley V. Middleton, John P. Caughlin, Laura E. Brown, Christina Jones, Aaron T. Seaman, Bryan B. Whaley, John C. Lammers and Austin S. Babrow and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Qualitative Health Research and Communication Monographs.

In The Last Decade

Anne M. Stone

21 papers receiving 334 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Anne M. Stone United States 8 145 117 112 104 71 22 350
Jacquelyn Benson United States 10 149 1.0× 103 0.9× 123 1.1× 115 1.1× 50 0.7× 54 370
Marjorie Kagawa Singer United States 8 115 0.8× 138 1.2× 123 1.1× 157 1.5× 41 0.6× 11 404
Åsa Roxberg Sweden 12 74 0.5× 85 0.7× 92 0.8× 99 1.0× 50 0.7× 31 334
Maryam Vahidi Iran 11 95 0.7× 179 1.5× 136 1.2× 153 1.5× 115 1.6× 31 478
Chad Hammond Canada 10 131 0.9× 73 0.6× 86 0.8× 70 0.7× 37 0.5× 33 345
Hilde de Vocht Netherlands 5 83 0.6× 52 0.4× 68 0.6× 92 0.9× 92 1.3× 7 295
Amanda Kracen United States 7 96 0.7× 123 1.1× 73 0.7× 290 2.8× 72 1.0× 16 499
Duygu Hi̇çdurmaz Türkiye 12 65 0.4× 114 1.0× 42 0.4× 182 1.8× 101 1.4× 37 365
Merle A. Keitel United States 9 124 0.9× 82 0.7× 58 0.5× 145 1.4× 95 1.3× 18 407
Kadriye Buldukoğlu Türkiye 10 79 0.5× 94 0.8× 47 0.4× 135 1.3× 60 0.8× 44 348

Countries citing papers authored by Anne M. Stone

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anne M. Stone's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anne M. Stone with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anne M. Stone more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anne M. Stone

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anne M. Stone. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anne M. Stone. The network helps show where Anne M. Stone may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Anne M. Stone

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Anne M. Stone. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Anne M. Stone based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Anne M. Stone. Anne M. Stone is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Scott, Allison M., et al.. (2024). Examining the communication work of women who have tested BRCA‐positive: “I feel this responsibility to let people know”. Journal of Genetic Counseling. 34(1). e1898–e1898. 1 indexed citations
2.
Scott, Allison M., et al.. (2023). Women’s Metaphors About BRCA Gene Testing and How They Can Inform Health Communication Theory and Practice. Health Communication. 39(3). 603–615. 5 indexed citations
3.
Kay, Adam D., Eric J. Chapman, Susan R. Singer, et al.. (2022). Potential for urban agriculture to support accessible and impactful undergraduate biology education. Ecology and Evolution. 12(3). e8721–e8721. 4 indexed citations
4.
Babrow, Austin S. & Anne M. Stone. (2021). Theories of Communication and Uncertainty as a Foundation for Future Research on Nursing Practice. USF Scholarship Repository (University of San Francisco). 1(1). 3. 1 indexed citations
5.
Stone, Anne M.. (2018). Communication and bioethics at the end of life: Real cases, real dilemmas. Health Communication. 35(1). 127–128. 2 indexed citations
6.
Seaman, Aaron T. & Anne M. Stone. (2017). Little White Lies: Interrogating the (Un)acceptability of Deception in the Context of Dementia.. PubMed. 27(1). 60–73. 7 indexed citations
7.
Stone, Anne M.. (2016). Teaching Music History with Your Mouth Shut. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.
8.
Seaman, Aaron T. & Anne M. Stone. (2015). Little White Lies. Qualitative Health Research. 27(1). 60–73. 21 indexed citations
9.
Stone, Anne M., et al.. (2013). Using Information to Manage Uncertainty During Organ Transplantation. 2(1). 42–60. 4 indexed citations
10.
Stone, Anne M. & John C. Lammers. (2012). The Uncertainty Room: Strategies for Managing Uncertainty in a Surgical Waiting Room. The Permanente Journal. 16(4). 27–30. 4 indexed citations
11.
Stone, Anne M., et al.. (2012). Caring for a Parent with Lung Cancer. Qualitative Health Research. 22(7). 957–970. 34 indexed citations
12.
Whaley, Bryan B., et al.. (2011). “The system is beginning to shut down”: Utilizing caregivers' metaphors for dementia, persons with dementia, and caregiving. Applied Nursing Research. 25(3). 146–151. 16 indexed citations
13.
Caughlin, John P., et al.. (2011). Being Open without Talking about It: A Rhetorical/Normative Approach to Understanding Topic Avoidance in Families after a Lung Cancer Diagnosis. Communication Monographs. 78(4). 409–436. 93 indexed citations
14.
Stone, Anne M.. (2011). Patient and Provider Interaction: A Global Health Communication Perspective, by Lisa Sparks and Melinda Villagran. Health Communication. 26(8). 777–778. 1 indexed citations
15.
Thompson, Teresa L., Bryan B. Whaley, & Anne M. Stone. (2011). Explaining Illness: Issues Concerning the Co-Construction of Explications. 319–331. 2 indexed citations
16.
Stone, Anne M.. (2011). "We don't like to call it lying, it's just therapeutic communication": Understanding the influence of social support on coping with illness uncertainty. Illinois Digital Environment for Access to Learning and Scholarship (University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign). 1 indexed citations
17.
Stone, Anne M. & Christina Jones. (2009). Sources of Uncertainty: Experiences of Alzheimer's Disease. Issues in Mental Health Nursing. 30(11). 677–686. 25 indexed citations
18.
Stone, Anne M.. (2009). Bearing Partial Witness: Representations of Missing Women. The Review of Education Pedagogy & Cultural Studies. 31(2-3). 221–236. 2 indexed citations
19.
Stone, Anne M. & Christina Jones. (2009). Sources of Uncertainty: Experiences of Alzheimer's Disease. Issues in Mental Health Nursing. 30(11). 677–686. 7 indexed citations
20.
Stone, Anne M., et al.. (2009). Medical, Personal, and Social Forms of Uncertainty Across the Transplantation Trajectory. Qualitative Health Research. 20(2). 182–196. 69 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026