Day Wong
Impact in
- Gender Studies top 5%
- Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
- Gender, Feminism, and Media
- Health top 10%
- Intimate Partner and Family Violence
Papers in
-
- Hong Kong and Taiwan Politics 3
- Sex work and related issues 2
- Work-Family Balance Challenges 2
- Socioeconomic Development in Asia 2
-
- Gender Roles and Identity Studies 3
- Co-authors
- Fanny M. Cheung (2 shared papers)Catherine So–kum Tang (2 shared papers)Laikwan Pang (1 shared paper)Xu Guo (1 shared paper)Eric R. Wright (2 shared papers)Paul Yip (1 shared paper)Waqar Ahmad (1 shared paper)Ted C. T. Fong (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Women s Studies International Forum (2 papers)Sexuality & Culture (2 papers)Sexualities (1 paper)Visual Anthropology (1 paper)Inter-Asia Cultural Studies (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- Hong KongUnited StatesCanada
In The Last Decade
Day Wong
16 papers receiving 226 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 38
- Gender Studies 114
- Health 73
- Social Psychology 96
- Sociology and Political Science 172
- Cultural Studies 25
Countries citing papers authored by Day Wong
This map shows the geographic impact of Day Wong's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Day Wong with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Day Wong more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Day Wong
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Day Wong. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Day Wong. The network helps show where Day Wong may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 8 scholars most cited alongside Day Wong, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2002 | 59 | |
| 2 | 2007 | 32 | |
| 3 | 2000 | 28 | |
| 4 | 2010 | 24 | |
| 5 | 2014 | 21 | |
| 6 | 2005 | 19 | |
| 7 | 2007 | 19 | |
| 8 | 2019 | 14 | |
| 9 | 2012 | 12 | |
| 10 | 2016 | 9 | |
| 11 | 2020 | 8 | |
| 12 | 2012 | 5 | |
| 13 | 2009 | 2 | |
| 14 | (Post-)identity politics and antinormalization: (Homo)sexual rights movement | 2011 | 2 |
| 15 | 2007 | 2 | |
| 16 | 2005 | 1 | |
| 17 | Passing and crossing: A study of transgender embodiment in Hong Kong | 2014 | 1 |
| 18 | 2021 | 1 | |
| 19 | 2024 | 0 | |
| 20 | 2024 | 0 |
About Day Wong
Day Wong is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Gender Studies, Social Psychology, Health and Clinical Psychology, having authored 22 papers that have together received 259 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy (7 papers), Hong Kong and Taiwan Politics (3 papers), Gender Roles and Identity Studies (3 papers), Fashion and Cultural Textiles (2 papers), Sex work and related issues (2 papers), Intimate Partner and Family Violence (2 papers), Work-Family Balance Challenges (2 papers) and Socioeconomic Development in Asia (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gender Studies (114 citations), Health (73 citations), Social Psychology (96 citations), Sociology and Political Science (172 citations) and Cultural Studies (25 citations). Day Wong has collaborated with scholars based in Hong Kong, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Fanny M. Cheung, Catherine So–kum Tang, Laikwan Pang, Xu Guo, Eric R. Wright, Paul Yip, Waqar Ahmad and Ted C. T. Fong. Their work appears in journals such as Women s Studies International Forum, Sexuality & Culture, Sexualities, Visual Anthropology and Inter-Asia Cultural Studies.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.