Inter-Asia Cultural Studies

880 papers and 5.3k indexed citations

About

The 880 papers published in Inter-Asia Cultural Studies in the last decades have received a total of 5.3k indexed citations. Papers published in Inter-Asia Cultural Studies usually cover Sociology and Political Science (551 papers), Cultural Studies (259 papers) and Political Science and International Relations (196 papers) specifically the topics of Asian Culture and Media Studies (158 papers), Japanese History and Culture (148 papers) and Hong Kong and Taiwan Politics (147 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Inter-Asia Cultural Studies are Ashish Rajadhyaksha, Mahmood Mamdani, Roberto Castillo, Chua Beng Huat, Partha Chatterjee, Lily Kong, Meaghan Morris, Aren Z. Aizura, Anthony Fung and Kuan‐Hsing Chen.

In The Last Decade

Inter-Asia Cultural Studies

625 papers receiving 4.0k citations

Countries where authors publish in Inter-Asia Cultural Studies

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Inter-Asia Cultural Studies. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Inter-Asia Cultural Studies with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Inter-Asia Cultural Studies more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Inter-Asia Cultural Studies

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Inter-Asia Cultural Studies. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Inter-Asia Cultural Studies.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026