David Stoker

25 papers receiving 242 citations

Peers

David Stoker
Comparison fields: 5 of 91
  • General Health Professions 95
  • Infectious Diseases 91
  • Information Systems 57
  • Library and Information Sciences 50
  • Economics and Econometrics 46
Replace M. Sara Lowe with:
M. Sara Lowe United States
Stephanie Swanberg United States
Peter Godwin United Kingdom
Hannah Spring United Kingdom
Carol Bellamy United States
Mary Beth Allen United States
Donghua Tao United States
Terrance Campbell United States
Scott S. Robinson Mexico
Mary L. Ross United States
David Stoker relative to M. Sara Lowe United States M. Sara Lowe's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.8×
M. Sara Lowe · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David Stoker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David Stoker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Stoker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Stoker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David Stoker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Stoker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Stoker. The network helps show where David Stoker may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of David Stoker

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of David Stoker. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of David Stoker based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with David Stoker. David Stoker is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1
THE ESTABLISHMENT OF PRINTING IN NORWICH CAUSES AND EFFECTS 1660-1760
0
2 0
3
The Berry family of Norwich : The rise and fall of a book trade dynasty
0
4 4
5 1
6 0
7
South African national household survey of HIV/AIDS prevalence, behavioural risks and mass media impact--detailed methodology and response rate results.
52
8 1
9 39
10 8
11 0
12 1
13 1
14 0
15
Using the Internet to Co-ordinate the Provision of Agricultural Information in the UK
1
16 1
17
Evaluation of Networked Information Sources.
15
18 0
19 1
20 2

About David Stoker

David Stoker is a scholar working on Library and Information Sciences, Research and Theory and Conservation, having authored 41 papers that have together received 287 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Library Science and Information Literacy (8 papers), Web and Library Services (7 papers) and Scottish History and National Identity (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Library and Information Sciences (50 citations), Infectious Diseases (91 citations) and General Health Professions (95 citations). David Stoker has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and South Africa. Frequent co-authors include Mark Colvin, Olive Shisana, Catherine Connolly, Alison Cooke, Leickness C. Simbayi, Christine Urquhart, Chris Armstrong, Rhian Thomas, Sean Jooste and Johan van Zÿl. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, Program electronic library and information systems and Education for Information.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026