David R. Badcock
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 0.2%
- Visual perception and processing mechanisms 148
- Neural dynamics and brain function 60
- Tactile and Sensory Interactions 19
- Ophthalmology top 1%
-
- Multisensory perception and integration 16
- Neurology top 2%
-
- Color Science and Applications 27
-
- Color perception and design 22
-
- Migraine and Headache Studies 20
-
- Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research 18
- Co-authors
- Andrew M. DerringtonAllison M. McKendrickMark EdwardsWilliam LovegroveJ. Edwin DickinsonMurray T. MayberyJason BellAlison Bowling
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited KingdomCanada
In The Last Decade
David R. Badcock
194 papers receiving 5.4k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 116
- Cognitive Neuroscience 4.8k
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 629
- Ophthalmology 413
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 583
- Neurology 370
Countries citing papers authored by David R. Badcock
This map shows the geographic impact of David R. Badcock's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David R. Badcock with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David R. Badcock more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by David R. Badcock
This network shows the impact of papers produced by David R. Badcock. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David R. Badcock. The network helps show where David R. Badcock may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside David R. Badcock, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2024 | 0 | |
| 3 | 2023 | 2 | |
| 4 | 2023 | 2 | |
| 5 | 2022 | 1 | |
| 6 | 2022 | 11 | |
| 7 | 2022 | 3 | |
| 8 | 2021 | 10 | |
| 9 | 2019 | 2 | |
| 10 | 2019 | 4 | |
| 11 | 2019 | 3 | |
| 12 | 2017 | 33 | |
| 13 | 2016 | 10 | |
| 14 | 2011 | 1 | |
| 15 | 2009 | 66 | |
| 16 | 2004 | 59 | |
| 17 | Motion in depth distorts perceived stereoscopic depth | 2003 | 1 |
| 18 | 2001 | 20 | |
| 19 | 1998 | 3 | |
| 20 | Visual deficits in migraine sufferers: What do the methods tell us? | 1997 | 2 |
About David R. Badcock
David R. Badcock is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Neurology and Ophthalmology, having authored 198 papers that have together received 5.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Visual perception and processing mechanisms (148 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (60 papers), Color Science and Applications (27 papers), Color perception and design (22 papers), Migraine and Headache Studies (20 papers), Tactile and Sensory Interactions (19 papers), Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (18 papers) and Multisensory perception and integration (16 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (4.8k citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (629 citations) and Ophthalmology (413 citations). David R. Badcock has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Andrew M. Derrington, Allison M. McKendrick, Mark Edwards, William Lovegrove, J. Edwin Dickinson, Murray T. Maybery, Jason Bell, Alison Bowling, Algis J. Vingrys and Johanna C. Badcock. Their work appears in journals such as Nature, Science and PLoS ONE.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.