Alison Bowling
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 2%
- Developmental and Educational Psychology top 5%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 5%
- Statistics and Probability top 2%
- Social Psychology top 10%
- Co-authors
- William LovegroveDavid R. BadcockSusan J. PaxtonLes ChristidisF MartinTed ThompsonWalter L. SlaghuisAmanda Reichelt‐Brushett
- Topics
- Visual perception and processing mechanisms (15 papers)Mental Health and Patient Involvement (5 papers)Advanced Optical Imaging Technologies (4 papers)
- Journals
- SciencePLoS ONENeuropsychologia
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited StatesDenmark
In The Last Decade
Alison Bowling
43 papers receiving 1.1k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 121
- Cognitive Neuroscience 737
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 314
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 228
- Statistics and Probability 208
- Social Psychology 111
Countries citing papers authored by Alison Bowling
This map shows the geographic impact of Alison Bowling's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Alison Bowling with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Alison Bowling more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Alison Bowling
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Alison Bowling. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Alison Bowling. The network helps show where Alison Bowling may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Alison Bowling
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Alison Bowling. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Alison Bowling based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Alison Bowling. Alison Bowling is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | 4 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 8 | |
| 5 | 25 | |
| 6 | 26 | |
| 7 | 9 | |
| 8 | 33 | |
| 9 | 2 | |
| 10 | 15 | |
| 11 | 5 | |
| 12 | Active Aging: The Contribution of Psychology | 39 |
| 13 | 22 | |
| 14 | 0 | |
| 15 | 45 | |
| 16 | 1 | |
| 17 | 8 | |
| 18 | Target energy and inspection time | 0 |
| 19 | 26 | |
| 20 | 4 |
About Alison Bowling
Alison Bowling is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, General Decision Sciences and Social Psychology, having authored 50 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Visual perception and processing mechanisms (15 papers), Mental Health and Patient Involvement (5 papers) and Advanced Optical Imaging Technologies (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (737 citations), Statistics and Probability (208 citations) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (314 citations). Alison Bowling has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and Denmark. Frequent co-authors include William Lovegrove, David R. Badcock, Susan J. Paxton, Les Christidis, F Martin, Ted Thompson, Walter L. Slaghuis, Amanda Reichelt‐Brushett, James F. Donnelly and GT Pecl. Their work appears in journals such as Science, PLoS ONE and Neuropsychologia.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.