Sarah J. Waugh

1.0k total citations
52 papers, 798 citations indexed

About

Sarah J. Waugh is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Epidemiology and Social Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Sarah J. Waugh has authored 52 papers receiving a total of 798 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 47 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 18 papers in Epidemiology and 15 papers in Social Psychology. Recurrent topics in Sarah J. Waugh's work include Visual perception and processing mechanisms (47 papers), Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (18 papers) and Color Science and Applications (15 papers). Sarah J. Waugh is often cited by papers focused on Visual perception and processing mechanisms (47 papers), Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (18 papers) and Color Science and Applications (15 papers). Sarah J. Waugh collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Canada. Sarah J. Waugh's co-authors include Dennis M. Levi, Dennis M. Levi, John Siderov, Harold E. Bedell, Bettina L. Beard, Robert F. Hess, Robert J. Snowden, R. F. Hess, Robert F. Hess and Knut Nordby and has published in prestigious journals such as Scientific Reports, Vision Research and Journal of General Internal Medicine.

In The Last Decade

Sarah J. Waugh

52 papers receiving 779 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Sarah J. Waugh United Kingdom 16 702 278 139 128 103 52 798
Dennis M. Levi United States 16 669 1.0× 301 1.1× 108 0.8× 74 0.6× 54 0.5× 20 701
G. van den Brink Netherlands 15 547 0.8× 97 0.3× 155 1.1× 137 1.1× 61 0.6× 86 853
A. Philip Aitsebaomo United States 6 605 0.9× 128 0.5× 63 0.5× 86 0.7× 52 0.5× 6 669
Floris L. van Nes Netherlands 8 598 0.9× 127 0.5× 211 1.5× 134 1.0× 113 1.1× 24 884
S. P. McKee United States 13 535 0.8× 189 0.7× 95 0.7× 68 0.5× 73 0.7× 19 611
Alex S. Baldwin Canada 14 431 0.6× 198 0.7× 45 0.3× 136 1.1× 60 0.6× 43 492
Christopher Yo United States 9 664 0.9× 111 0.4× 113 0.8× 93 0.7× 46 0.4× 11 765
R. Hilz Germany 15 542 0.8× 166 0.6× 155 1.1× 106 0.8× 90 0.9× 25 635
D. M. Levi United States 6 460 0.7× 218 0.8× 40 0.3× 73 0.6× 38 0.4× 13 501
E.R. Howell Australia 13 899 1.3× 525 1.9× 146 1.1× 216 1.7× 76 0.7× 17 1.0k

Countries citing papers authored by Sarah J. Waugh

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sarah J. Waugh's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sarah J. Waugh with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sarah J. Waugh more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sarah J. Waugh

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sarah J. Waugh. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sarah J. Waugh. The network helps show where Sarah J. Waugh may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Sarah J. Waugh

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Sarah J. Waugh. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Sarah J. Waugh based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Sarah J. Waugh. Sarah J. Waugh is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Waugh, Sarah J. & Maria Fronius. (2024). Landolt C-Tests With “Fixed” Arcmin Separations Detect Amblyopia But Underestimate Crowding in Moderate-to-Severe Amblyopic Children and Adults. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 65(10). 33–33. 1 indexed citations
2.
Linhares, João M. M., et al.. (2022). Coloured filters can simulate colour deficiency in normal vision but cannot compensate for congenital colour vision deficiency. Scientific Reports. 12(1). 11140–11140. 7 indexed citations
3.
Gunn, Christine M., et al.. (2018). A Qualitative Study of Spanish-Speakers’ Experience with Dense Breast Notifications in a Massachusetts Safety-Net Hospital. Journal of General Internal Medicine. 34(2). 198–205. 22 indexed citations
4.
Waugh, Sarah J., et al.. (2018). Levelt’s laws do not predict perception when luminance- and contrast-modulated stimuli compete during binocular rivalry. Scientific Reports. 8(1). 14432–14432. 4 indexed citations
5.
Waugh, Sarah J., et al.. (2017). More superimposition for contrast-modulated than luminance-modulated stimuli during binocular rivalry. Vision Research. 142. 40–51. 9 indexed citations
6.
Bedell, Harold E., et al.. (2014). Evidence for an Eye-Movement Contribution to Normal Foveal Crowding. Optometry and Vision Science. 92(2). 237–245. 10 indexed citations
7.
Waugh, Sarah J., et al.. (2013). Measurement of interocular suppression across the binocular visual field using luminance-modulated and contrast-modulated noise stimuli. Journal of Vision. 13(9). 549–549. 1 indexed citations
8.
Bedell, Harold E., et al.. (2013). Contour interaction for foveal acuity targets at different luminances. Vision Research. 89. 90–95. 14 indexed citations
9.
Waugh, Sarah J., et al.. (2013). The Effects of Blur and Eccentric Viewing on Adult Acuity for Pediatric Tests: Implications for Amblyopia Detection. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 54(10). 6934–6934. 16 indexed citations
10.
Waugh, Sarah J., et al.. (2011). Effects of imposed Gaussian blur on contour interaction for luminance-modulated and contrast-modulated noisy Cs. Journal of Vision. 11(11). 1151–1151. 1 indexed citations
11.
Waugh, Sarah J., et al.. (2010). Lateral facilitation revealed dichoptically for luminance-modulated and contrast-modulated stimuli. Vision Research. 50(23). 2530–2542. 8 indexed citations
12.
Waugh, Sarah J., et al.. (2010). Lateral facilitation demonstrated dichoptically for luminance- and contrast-modulated stimuli. Journal of Vision. 9(8). 1014–1014. 1 indexed citations
13.
Waugh, Sarah J., et al.. (2010). Binocular summation for luminance- and contrast-modulated noise stimuli. Journal of Vision. 9(8). 1012–1012. 5 indexed citations
14.
Waugh, Sarah J., et al.. (2010). Lateral interactions across space reveal links between processing streams for luminance-modulated and contrast-modulated stimuli. Vision Research. 50(9). 889–903. 5 indexed citations
15.
Waugh, Sarah J., et al.. (2007). Separate first- and second-order processing is supported by spatial summation estimates at the fovea and eccentrically. Vision Research. 47(5). 581–596. 18 indexed citations
16.
Waugh, Sarah J. & David R. Badcock. (1998). A common pathway for spatial localisation of luminance-defined and contrast-defined blobs. Perception. 27. 0–0. 3 indexed citations
17.
Hess, Robert F., Sarah J. Waugh, & Knut Nordby. (1996). Rod temporal channels. Vision Research. 36(4). 613–619. 14 indexed citations
18.
Levi, Dennis M. & Sarah J. Waugh. (1995). Spatial scale shifts in peripheral vernier aculty. 4(48). 306. 7 indexed citations
19.
Snowden, Robert J., R. F. Hess, & Sarah J. Waugh. (1995). The processing of temporal modulation at different levels of retinal illuminance. Vision Research. 35(6). 775–789. 42 indexed citations
20.
Levi, Dennis M. & Sarah J. Waugh. (1994). Spatial scale shifts in peripheral vernier acuity. Vision Research. 34(17). 2215–2238. 48 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Dennis M. Levi Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by G. van den Brink Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by A. Philip Aitsebaomo Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Floris L. van Nes Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by S. P. McKee Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Alex S. Baldwin Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Christopher Yo Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by R. Hilz Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by D. M. Levi Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by E.R. Howell
Rankless by CCL
2026