Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Teamwork as an Essential Component of High‐Reliability Organizations
2006590 citationsDavid P. Baker, Eduardo Salas et al.profile →
The Family-School Relation and the Child's School Performance
1987466 citationsDavid Lee Stevenson, David P. BakerChild Developmentprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by David P. Baker
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of David P. Baker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David P. Baker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David P. Baker more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by David P. Baker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David P. Baker. The network helps show where David P. Baker may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of David P. Baker
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of David P. Baker.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of David P. Baker based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with David P. Baker. David P. Baker is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Baker, David P., et al.. (2015). Science Productivity, Higher Education Development and the Knowledge Society (SPHERE Project) Final Report. Open Repository and Bibliography (University of Luxembourg).2 indexed citations
Baker, David P.. (2001). Invited Commentary: TIMSS-R: Innovation in International Information for American Educators.. 3(1). 17–19.1 indexed citations
10.
Baker, David P., Cornelius Riordan, & Andrew M. Greeley. (1999). It's Not About the Failure of Catholic Schools: Its About Demographic Transformations; More Assertions Not Backed By Data.. Phi Delta Kappan. 80(6). 462.4 indexed citations
11.
Baker, David P. & Cornelius Riordan. (1998). The 'Eliting' of the Common American Catholic School and the National Education Crisis. Phi Delta Kappan. 80(1). 16–23.47 indexed citations
12.
Baker, David P. & Thomas Smith. (1997). The Condition of Academic Achievement in the Nation. Trend 1.. Teachers College Record The Voice of Scholarship in Education. 99(1). 14–18.1 indexed citations
13.
Baker, David P. & Thomas Smith. (1997). A College Education for All? Trend 3.. Teachers College Record The Voice of Scholarship in Education. 99(1). 57–60.4 indexed citations
Baker, David P. & Thomas Smith. (1997). Teacher Turnover and Teacher Quality: Refocusing the Issue. Trend 2.. Teachers College Record The Voice of Scholarship in Education. 99(1). 29–35.21 indexed citations
Yogev, Abraham, David P. Baker, & Alexander W. Wiseman. (1989). International perspectives on education and society : a research and policy annual. JAI Press eBooks.3 indexed citations
Stevenson, David Lee & David P. Baker. (1987). The Family-School Relation and the Child's School Performance. Child Development. 58(5). 1348–1357.466 indexed citations breakdown →
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.