David N. Daum

484 total citations
23 papers, 329 citations indexed

About

David N. Daum is a scholar working on Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation, Sociology and Political Science and Social Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, David N. Daum has authored 23 papers receiving a total of 329 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 13 papers in Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation, 8 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 7 papers in Social Psychology. Recurrent topics in David N. Daum's work include Physical Education and Pedagogy (12 papers), Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports (6 papers) and Inclusion and Disability in Education and Sport (6 papers). David N. Daum is often cited by papers focused on Physical Education and Pedagogy (12 papers), Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports (6 papers) and Inclusion and Disability in Education and Sport (6 papers). David N. Daum collaborates with scholars based in United States and Ireland. David N. Daum's co-authors include Amelia Mays Woods, Chad M. Killian, Risto Marttinen, Dominique Banville, Kim C. Graber, Brian Mosier, Sean M. Bulger, Eloise Elliott, Emily Jones and Stephen Silverman and has published in prestigious journals such as Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, Journal of Teaching in Physical Education and Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy.

In The Last Decade

David N. Daum

21 papers receiving 309 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
David N. Daum United States 13 175 107 85 83 73 23 329
Mustafa Levent İnce Türkiye 12 178 1.0× 94 0.9× 111 1.3× 146 1.8× 84 1.2× 36 371
Chad M. Killian United States 15 343 2.0× 154 1.4× 217 2.6× 168 2.0× 94 1.3× 48 552
Jennifer M. Krause United States 10 177 1.0× 104 1.0× 122 1.4× 93 1.1× 89 1.2× 42 338
Ασπασία Δανιά Greece 8 168 1.0× 104 1.0× 99 1.2× 72 0.9× 126 1.7× 45 348
Kevin Mercier United States 13 371 2.1× 84 0.8× 161 1.9× 233 2.8× 149 2.0× 29 520
Frank Herold United Kingdom 9 159 0.9× 107 1.0× 109 1.3× 65 0.8× 42 0.6× 16 273
JeongAe You South Korea 9 98 0.6× 88 0.8× 103 1.2× 61 0.7× 28 0.4× 69 266
Alejandro Almonacid-Fierro Chile 10 58 0.3× 147 1.4× 28 0.3× 42 0.5× 40 0.5× 43 295
Okseon Lee South Korea 11 153 0.9× 111 1.0× 100 1.2× 169 2.0× 63 0.9× 48 361
Manuel Jacob Sierra-Díaz Spain 9 208 1.2× 35 0.3× 75 0.9× 172 2.1× 162 2.2× 20 373

Countries citing papers authored by David N. Daum

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David N. Daum's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David N. Daum with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David N. Daum more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David N. Daum

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David N. Daum. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David N. Daum. The network helps show where David N. Daum may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of David N. Daum

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of David N. Daum. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of David N. Daum based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with David N. Daum. David N. Daum is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Killian, Chad M., et al.. (2025). Exploring K-12 Physical Education Teachers’ Acceptance and Use of Online Learning: A Theoretical Approach. American Journal of Distance Education. 39(4). 426–444.
2.
Daum, David N., et al.. (2025). TPACK as a Strategy When Physical Education Teachers Face Technostress. Journal of Physical Education Recreation & Dance. 96(7). 35–39.
3.
Daum, David N., et al.. (2021). I Need Help! Physical Educators Transition to Distance Learning During COVID-19. The Physical Educator. 78(2). 12 indexed citations
4.
Daum, David N., et al.. (2021). Toward Quality Online Physical Education: Research Questions and Future Directions. 6(4). 199–211. 18 indexed citations
5.
Killian, Chad M., et al.. (2021). Distance Learning in Physical Education: Hindsight Is 2020 — Part 3. Journal of Physical Education Recreation & Dance. 92(4). 18–21. 13 indexed citations
6.
Daum, David N., et al.. (2021). How Do We Do This? Distance Learning in Physical Education — Part 1. Journal of Physical Education Recreation & Dance. 92(4). 5–10. 25 indexed citations
7.
Daum, David N., Risto Marttinen, & Dominique Banville. (2021). Service-learning experiences for pre-service teachers: cultural competency and behavior management challenges when working with a diverse low-income community. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy. 27(4). 396–408. 14 indexed citations
8.
Jones, Emily, et al.. (2020). Predicting Student Success in Online Physical Education. American Journal of Distance Education. 35(1). 17–32. 18 indexed citations
9.
Daum, David N.. (2020). Thinking about Hybrid or Online Learning in Physical Education? Start Here!. Journal of Physical Education Recreation & Dance. 91(1). 42–44. 23 indexed citations
10.
Marttinen, Risto, et al.. (2019). Pre-service teachers learning through service-learning in a low SES school. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy. 25(1). 1–15. 20 indexed citations
11.
Marttinen, Risto, et al.. (2019). Students’ Perceptions of Technology Integration During the F.I.T. Unit. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport. 90(2). 206–216. 13 indexed citations
12.
Daum, David N., et al.. (2018). Physical Education Gym Class Heroes, Try-Hards, and All-Stars: An Analysis of Facebook Comments. The Physical Educator. 75(3). 414–437. 2 indexed citations
13.
Reynolds, Erin, et al.. (2016). Pickleball Transcends the Generations in Southwest Indiana: A University and Area Agency on Aging Partnership Changing the Face of Aging. Journal of Intergenerational Relationships. 14(3). 242–251. 9 indexed citations
14.
Daum, David N. & Amelia Mays Woods. (2015). Physical Education Teacher Educator’s Perceptions Toward and Understanding of K-12 Online Physical Education. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education. 34(4). 716–724. 23 indexed citations
15.
Woods, Amelia Mays, et al.. (2015). JTPE: A 30-Year Retrospective of Published Research. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education. 35(1). 4–15. 4 indexed citations
16.
Woods, Amelia Mays, et al.. (2015). Young School Children’s Recess Physical Activity: Movement Patterns and Preferences. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education. 34(3). 496–516. 12 indexed citations
17.
Daum, David N., et al.. (2014). Research on teaching blended and online physical education. 201–223. 20 indexed citations
18.
Daum, David N.. (2012). Physical Education Teacher Educator's Attitudes toward and Understanding of Online Physical Education.. 1–103. 2 indexed citations
19.
Woods, Amelia Mays, Kim C. Graber, & David N. Daum. (2012). Children’s Recess Physical Activity: Movement Patterns and Preferences. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education. 31(2). 146–162. 17 indexed citations
20.
Daum, David N., et al.. (2012). The Status of High School Online Physical Education in the United States. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education. 31(1). 86–100. 57 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026