David Lansky

2.3k citations
57 papers · 1.8k indexed · h-index 25

David Lansky

56 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Peers

David Lansky
Comparison fields: 5 of 147
  • Health Information Management 168
  • General Health Professions 550
  • Medical Terminology 5
  • Applied Psychology 83
  • Pharmacology 254
Replace Mark Lemstra with:
Mark Lemstra Canada
Aneesa Motala United States
Jessica M Beroes United States
E.M. Sluijs Netherlands
Pierre Frémont Canada
Donald E. Nease United States
John Moraros Canada
David Newby Australia
Mitchell J. Barnett United States
Ashraf El‐Metwally Saudi Arabia
David Lansky relative to Mark Lemstra Canada Mark Lemstra's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Mark Lemstra · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David Lansky

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David Lansky's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Lansky with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Lansky more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David Lansky

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Lansky. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Lansky. The network helps show where David Lansky may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside David Lansky, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David Lansky Line = papers co-authored together David Lansky links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 201165
2 200915
3 200518
4 2005171
5 200422
6 200220
7 200055
8 199940
9 199823
10 19961
11 19965
12 199540
13
Measuring the success of treatment in patient terms.
199589
14 199447
15 199425
16
Empowering the Patient: Tailored Health Information for Decision Making.
19931
17 199316
18
Hospital-Based Outcomes Management: Enhancing Quality of Care with Coordinated Data Systems.
19892
19 1984135
20 198298

About David Lansky

David Lansky is a scholar working on Health Information Management, Applied Psychology, General Health Professions, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 57 papers that have together received 1.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Healthcare Policy and Management (10 papers), Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare (8 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (5 papers), Primary Care and Health Outcomes (5 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (4 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (4 papers), Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty (4 papers) and Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health Information Management (168 citations), General Health Professions (550 citations), Medical Terminology (5 citations), Applied Psychology (83 citations) and Pharmacology (254 citations). David Lansky has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Somalia. Frequent co-authors include Paul C. Tang, Peter E. Nathan, Richard C. Phillips, G. Terence Wilson, John L. Shelton, Donald A. Calsyn, Wilbert E. Fordyce, Daniel L. Rock, Walter C. Stolov and Gary L. Grunkemeier. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, Health Affairs, Journal of Abnormal Psychology, Quality Management in Health Care and Pain.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026