David F. Sly

2.3k citations
54 papers · 1.8k indexed · h-index 24

David F. Sly

52 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Peers

David F. Sly
Comparison fields: 5 of 123
  • Applied Psychology 291
  • General Health Professions 556
  • Demography 241
  • Physiology 462
  • Literature and Literary Theory 183
Replace Michelle Miller‐Day with:
Michelle Miller‐Day United States
Peter Messeri United States
Lawrence Wallack United States
K. Viswanath United States
Shelly Campo United States
John Chesterman Australia
Marie Helweg‐Larsen United States
Austin S. Babrow United States
Janet Shucksmith United Kingdom
Dwayne Proctor United States
David F. Sly relative to Michelle Miller‐Day United States Michelle Miller‐Day's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.5×
Michelle Miller‐Day · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David F. Sly

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David F. Sly's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David F. Sly with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David F. Sly more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David F. Sly

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David F. Sly. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David F. Sly. The network helps show where David F. Sly may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside David F. Sly, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David F. Sly Line = papers co-authored together David F. Sly links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20164
2 20152
3 201311
4 201235
5
Peer Reviewed: Changes in Youth Cigarette Use Following the Dismantling of an Antitobacco Media Campaign in Florida
20106
6 200532
7 200298
8 2001159
9 20011
10 200085
11 200016
12
Dual-method use among an ethnically diverse group of women at risk of HIV infection.
199835
13 199826
14 19976
15
Factors associated with use of the female condom.
199738
16 19958
17 199114
18 19884
19 19873
20 19724

About David F. Sly

David F. Sly is a scholar working on Applied Psychology, General Health Professions and Demography, having authored 54 papers that have together received 1.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Smoking Behavior and Cessation (13 papers), Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health (11 papers), Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies (7 papers), Global Health Care Issues (6 papers), Migration and Labor Dynamics (6 papers), Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (6 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (6 papers) and HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (291 citations), General Health Professions (556 citations) and Demography (241 citations). David F. Sly has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and China. Frequent co-authors include Sarah Ray, Isaac W. Eberstein, David M. Quadagno, Kara Riehman, Richard S. Hopkins, Gary R. Heald, Edward Trapido, William J. Serow, Hosanna Soler and Charles B. Nam. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American Statistical Association, Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews and American Sociological Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026