Anna R. Docherty

10.8k citations
88 papers · 1.2k indexed · h-index 20

Anna R. Docherty

79 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

Anna R. Docherty
Comparison fields: 5 of 97
  • Biological Psychiatry 77
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 372
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 435
  • Clinical Psychology 425
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 298
Replace Avi Reichenberg with:
Avi Reichenberg United States
Douglas S. Lehrer United States
Daniel R. Wilson United States
Trine Vik Lagerberg Norway
Antonio Labad Spain
Carin J. Meijer Netherlands
Eugenia Kravariti United Kingdom
Sofie R. Aminoff Norway
Steven O. Moldin United States
Sarah E. Morris United States
Anna R. Docherty relative to Avi Reichenberg United States Avi Reichenberg's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.3×
Avi Reichenberg · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Anna R. Docherty

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anna R. Docherty's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna R. Docherty with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna R. Docherty more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anna R. Docherty

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna R. Docherty. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna R. Docherty. The network helps show where Anna R. Docherty may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Anna R. Docherty, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Anna R. Docherty Line = papers co-authored together Anna R. Docherty links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20250
2 20250
3 20251
4 20241
5 202411
6 20240
7 20241
8 20240
9 20242
10 20245
11 20230
12 202119
13 202113
14 20219
15 202013
16 20198
17 201996
18 201824
19 201724
20 201311

About Anna R. Docherty

Anna R. Docherty is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental health, Biological Psychiatry and Genetics, having authored 88 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Genetic Associations and Epidemiology (17 papers), Suicide and Self-Harm Studies (15 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (15 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (13 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (13 papers), Cognitive Abilities and Testing (9 papers), Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (7 papers) and Mental Health and Psychiatry (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biological Psychiatry (77 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (372 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (435 citations), Clinical Psychology (425 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (298 citations). Anna R. Docherty has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Canada. Frequent co-authors include John G. Kerns, Elizabeth A. Martin, David C. Cicero, Theresa M. Becker, Scott R. Sponheim, Andrey A. Shabalin, Roman Kotov, Katherine Jonas, Kenneth S. Kendler and Hilary Coon. Their work appears in journals such as Psychological Medicine, American Journal of Medical Genetics Part B Neuropsychiatric Genetics, Schizophrenia Research, European Neuropsychopharmacology and Molecular Psychiatry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026