David Cowart
-
- Contemporary Literature and Criticism 18
- Narrative Theory and Analysis 7
- Literature, Film, and Journalism Analysis 3
- Themes in Literature Analysis 3
- American and British Literature Analysis 3
- Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism 2
- Visual Arts and Performing Arts top 10%
- Comics and Graphic Narratives 2
- Cultural Studies top 10%
-
- Reformation and Early Modern Christianity 1
- Co-authors
- Edward MendelsonAlec McHoulDavid WillsMark OsteenRobin Blume-KohoutRobert MerrillD. FowlerThomas Schaub
- Partner nations
- United StatesNetherlandsCanada
In The Last Decade
David Cowart
25 papers receiving 86 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 30
- Literature and Literary Theory 139
- Visual Arts and Performing Arts 18
- Cultural Studies 15
- Philosophy 10
- History 9
Countries citing papers authored by David Cowart
This map shows the geographic impact of David Cowart's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Cowart with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Cowart more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by David Cowart
This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Cowart. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Cowart. The network helps show where David Cowart may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 13 scholars most cited alongside David Cowart, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2012 | 1 | |
| 2 | 2012 | 15 | |
| 3 | 2003 | 0 | |
| 4 | The Luddite Vision: Mason & Dixon | 1999 | 10 |
| 5 | 1999 | 1 | |
| 6 | Matriarchal Mythopoesis: Naylor's Mama Day | 1998 | 0 |
| 7 | Heritage and Deracination in Walker's "Everyday Use." (Alice Walker) | 1996 | 1 |
| 8 | "The Rhythm of Three Strands": Cultural Braiding in Dorris's A Yellow Raft in Blue Water | 1996 | 0 |
| 9 | 1996 | 3 | |
| 10 | 1994 | 4 | |
| 11 | Continuity and Growth | 1990 | 3 |
| 12 | 1990 | 9 | |
| 13 | 1989 | 1 | |
| 14 | From Nuns' Island to Monkstown: Celibacy, Concupiscence, and Sterility in "The Dead" | 1989 | 1 |
| 15 | 1986 | 0 | |
| 16 | 1986 | 6 | |
| 17 | 1982 | 2 | |
| 18 | Oedipal Dynamics in Jane Eyre | 1981 | 1 |
| 19 | 1981 | 4 | |
| 20 | 1979 | 25 |
About David Cowart
David Cowart is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Visual Arts and Performing Arts and Classics, having authored 41 papers that have together received 158 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Contemporary Literature and Criticism (18 papers), Narrative Theory and Analysis (7 papers), Literature, Film, and Journalism Analysis (3 papers), Themes in Literature Analysis (3 papers), American and British Literature Analysis (3 papers), Comics and Graphic Narratives (2 papers), Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism (2 papers) and Reformation and Early Modern Christianity (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (139 citations), Visual Arts and Performing Arts (18 citations) and Cultural Studies (15 citations). David Cowart has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Edward Mendelson, Alec McHoul, David Wills, Mark Osteen, Robin Blume-Kohout, Robert Merrill, D. Fowler, Thomas Schaub, Khachig Tölölyan and Thomas B. Greenslade.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.